kami wrote:that is not completely true. it can speed up the texture loading and opening of the mxs file before the rendering. and it'll slightly speed up the writing of the mxi during status updates (with Raid 0 not Raid 1 of course). So you'll get a tiny speed advantage, but the disadvantages are:
- if one discs out of the two breaks, you'll lose all your data
- it costs a lot of money
Do you know how big the mxi file has to be, to make the purchase of a 15k HD reasonable?
I could have this one (but I don't know how much more expensive is a MB with SAS) for $180: Fujitsu 147GB 15000 RPM Serial Attached SCSI (SAS).
This is $140 more than a 7.2K 160GB common - and at the moment small - HD.
This money could be spent on a better CPU.
Like going from a Q8200 @ 2.33 to a Q9650 @ 3.00. (It is $160 at the moment, so $20 more).
Or even better, for $70 more ($210 difference), it is possible to move
from:
[Q8200@2.33 + GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3R + G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 1066 (PC2 8500)]
to:
[Core i7 920@2.66GHz + GIGABYTE GA-EX58-UD3R + G.SKILL 3GB (3 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1333 (PC3 10666)]
Which choice is better?
How much work as to be done writing on the HD to prefer a faster one over a speed bump on the CPU?
Ciao, Gio