1st Maxwell Television w/ alpha 1.1.33

All posts relating to Maxwell Render 1.x
 Reply
User avatar

By hyltom
-  Wed May 18, 2005 7:37 am #26223
Image

hyltom

By DELETED
-  Wed May 18, 2005 7:44 am #26225
DELETED
User avatar

By tom
-  Wed May 18, 2005 8:12 am #26229
WOOOWW!!!! :shock:
znouza, thomas, michael and hyltom,
I'm really amazed with your renders guys!!!!
You know the first TV in this world was a crap also... :lol:
And I couldn't figure out how you did these, especially hyltom's...
We're surely using bunch of different technology...hehehe
Very nice contributions, thx for your time!

By Renato Lemus
-  Wed May 18, 2005 8:22 am #26231
ok guys, I found a solution, not sure if it's as good as yours
Last edited by Renato Lemus on Wed May 18, 2005 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar

By Tyrone Marshall
-  Wed May 18, 2005 8:23 am #26233
My experiment did not work out, but it is unique, I will post it once it is done.

These are very wonderful techniques, is it light pulling through plastic and glass materials with closed emitters?

By Renato Lemus
-  Wed May 18, 2005 8:35 am #26236
my 5 minutes test, 1 emitter, no plastics, no metals, no dielectrics,

Image
User avatar

By hyltom
-  Wed May 18, 2005 8:40 am #26237
Like if i was going to teach you something Tom!
I don't believe it :shock:

Hyltom
User avatar

By Thomas An.
-  Wed May 18, 2005 8:49 am #26238
Here is one with no emitters at all.... just magic dust...

It is fast too (11min)

EDIT: ok now it is (22min)
Image
Last edited by Thomas An. on Wed May 18, 2005 10:02 am, edited 2 times in total.

By Renato Lemus
-  Wed May 18, 2005 9:02 am #26241
Thomas An. wrote:Here is one with no emitters at all.... just magic dust...
:shock:
User avatar

By tom
-  Wed May 18, 2005 9:22 am #26245
No one will believe me but I'm totally clueless about the last tests. :shock:
I did something, you did everything. Incredible, really incredible!
Were you all waiting for me :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Oscar, please remove MXI support from the roadmap, also emitters... heheheh
You see, these guys rock! :D
User avatar

By Mihai
-  Wed May 18, 2005 9:59 am #26258
So you turn on environment and play with the iso settings, maybe burn?

I like this secrecy, I think we should make every post like this from now on....

You must have something in the scene making light, otherwise Maxwell isn't physically correct at all :P If it's not an emitter than it's the environment.
User avatar

By Thomas An.
-  Wed May 18, 2005 10:05 am #26260
Mihai Iliuta wrote:So you turn on environment and play with the iso settings, maybe burn?

I like this secrecy, I think we should make every post like this from now on.... :P
Mihai, Tom,

It is the easiest thing. (and no emitters)

Basically it is a fluorescent surface.
It takes the existing illumination and amplifies it.

-Turn on the skydome at 0.6
-Assign a plastic material to a single surface
-Assign the same image as a specularMap and a GlossyMap@60 simultaneously.

The gloosy map does the amplication (glow)
The reflection map gives the color
(Use no Texture maps at all)

-
Last edited by Thomas An. on Wed May 18, 2005 10:42 am, edited 3 times in total.

By DELETED
-  Wed May 18, 2005 10:10 am #26264
DELETED
User avatar

By tom
-  Wed May 18, 2005 10:18 am #26265
Damn good! Bravo!
As I always imagined how it could be, but there's a problem :D
Can you do it with daytime? I mean physical sky....
My psycho tech worx at any condition and lighting :P

p.s: don't worry, i'll explain my way after some more replys...heheh
 Reply
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 12
 Return to “Maxwell Render 1.x”
render engines and Maxwell

I'm talking about arch-viz and architecture as tho[…]

READ MORE
Materials show no thumbnail or preview (macOS)

When wanting to select a material with File > O[…]

READ MORE
Benchwell with command line broken in Maxwell 5

> .\maxwell.exe -benchwell -nowait -priority:[…]

READ MORE
VIEW MORE TOPICS