Add here your best high-quality Maxwell images.
By smeggy
#37729
I've been so tempted to post a giant sized ass-searing over this whole thing but I'm biting my tongue. I'm very disappointed in all the sqwall attacks and frankly, annoyed as hell with people who should know better.
By jep
#37753
right on smeggy - people that I once thought were extremely dialed in to the tech side of things are turning out to be whiney little b*tches... seriously, you guys just lost so much credibility...

Those that can not do, critique...

and the beauty of it is... I don't give a rat's right nut what you think of me.....
User avatar
By Mihai
#37761
CUT!!

Ok jep that was good, good emotion.....I think we'll nail this scene if you can just tone it down....just a little bit..

ok.....ACTION!!



btw, I think it's time for a:

"I demand an apology"
By jep
#37789
as I said... b*tches
By aaaaaa
#37815
yep!

i thought these forums were too fag sissy like!

NOW THATS MORE LIKE IT!
FIGHT LIKE A REAL MEN!!!
User avatar
By Mihai
#37837
jep wrote:as I said... b*tches
learn the difference between arguing with somebody and insulting them you stupid moron....
By n1tram
#37839
Lol nice one mihai... :wink:

(just remove the moron part) :D
User avatar
By rivoli
#37846
aa would say that the moron part is where mihai proves to be a real man, he knows what they look like.
User avatar
By Mihai
#37852
OPD wrote: I agree with Jep totally, the people who 'rubbished' Sqwall's work just because it contained post-processed elements should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.
For about the 20th time, it's not because he post processed it....read why people were suspicious, read the reason for that suspicion. It didn't do any good when sqwall posted the already post processed image when asked if he could post the initial image.

Frankly it wasn't such a big deal, everybody exaggerated a bit, no worries, until some people cross the line and I can't stand for that, sorry.....

ok, good night....
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#37857
Where does it categorise the MW forums as a 'technical only' forum, I would like to know.
Somehow this thought is out of context. This is a pre-release software-beta process. It is expected that we need to see the potential of the engine itself. Is that not enough common sense?
Maxwell render is essentially a piece of software that allows the facilitation of CGI constructs, just like FinalRender, Brazil R/S or any other standalone or plug-in renderer - but it does not mean that this software, in it's final form or not can NOT be used alongside tried and tested techniques that allow for better imagery
Correct. I agree... but you are in CGtalk frame of mind.

As long as we know upfront how much of it is Maxwell, then post process all you want.

Sqwall, has now correctly amended his post and also later-on identifies the post-processing elements involved. So the situation is now resolved. As far as I am concearned Sqwall is now cool 8)

People who come here late in the discussion are not aware of all the original details.
By jep
#37874
mihai..
that's actually pretty funny - considering my comments weren't directed toward you... yet, it seems that you identified with them.

BTW, In the future if you're trying to insult someone, stupid moron is redundant... it says more about you than me. Now if you would've said that my spelling sucks and that my grammar is a waste of time... I'd have to agree!

I look forward to still picking your brain - you have many technical aspects nailed down... unless you choose to hold onto your self-constructed anger - it's your choice.
Last edited by jep on Thu Jun 23, 2005 5:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By Mihai
#37887
jep wrote:
BTW, In the future if you're trying to insult someone, stupid moron is redundant... it says more about you than me.
silly pleonasms is all that's left when you bring a discussion down to the level you brought it. Maybe you've lived too long in LA-LA land, you forget how to have a normal argument with normal people.

This entire forum is virtually left unmoderated, we don't have silly nudity warnings (or "partial nudity" warnings :roll: ), no closed threads, because people don't cross the line.....or if they do it's not "you whining bitches". We like to keep it this way, even if 0.01% of the users have.....issues.

yeah...enough of this....
By sqwall
#37891
:) The funniest thing is that when I add new image to my "gallery" its going to be on page 8 or page 12 if I did not post it soon.

Very Funny Boys. :lol:
User avatar
By tom
#37894
Yes Mihai, I can't believe how people cannot read and understand words.
And Justice For All....
By DudeMiester
#37897
Shame to waste my first post on such a silly thread, but maybe you guys should start another thread to continue this "discussion" (cough, flamewar), and delete 90% of the posts in this overly bloated thread. This the the User Gallery, not the debate forum.

It's just annoying when I'm trying to browse these works of art.

EDIT: Just a though, maybe you can make a technical gallery forum for all you "purists" out there.
  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
render engines and Maxwell

"prompt, edit, prompt" How will an AI r[…]