Any features you'd like to see implemented into Maxwell?

Which plugin is the most important one for you?

3D Studio Max
102
22%
Maya
55
12%
Lightwave
41
9%
Cinema 4D
93
20%
Rhino 3D
65
14%
Solidworks
13
3%
FormZ
35
8%
Sketchup
42
9%
ArchiCAD
7
2%
Houdini
1
0%
User avatar
By Olivier Cugniet
#92907
well, either there are very few maya users or they are all sleeping :wink: :lol: :lol:
By Maya69
#92921
i m wake up
By Becco_UK
#93115
Fluffy: according to Tom only a few hours are needed to make a plugin!This is a reply of his to someone that I came across in another thread:

"Hi *******,

Thank you for contacting! All the team was concentrated on the application for the last days.
Plugins are really not hard to make and it's just a matter of few hours free time.
So please don't worry about them, we will provide them ASAP in some days.
Currently there are vital issues as you know But we didn't forget plugins

Cheers,
Atilla Akin // Tom
Next Limit Technologies"
By MickyMicky
#93207
MICROSTATION would be fine...

There are a lot of MS-Users who are keen on a high-class renderer.

Since a long time the official bentley visualizing forum is full of comments concerning that ! It's the most frequented MS-forum (1 after "MS-in general")

You would come just at the right moment ... !!!

Best wishes ! ....
By Maya69
#93222
maya user is now wake up (we have gain 1 point)
User avatar
By cyberjuls
#93269
XSI....
User avatar
By Leonardo
#93385
Man!!! we better take the "C4D" and "3DS MAX" out of the poll... if not, the maya pluging will never get node! :x :wink:

leo
By RedRaven
#93396
sketchup sketchup sketchup sketchup sketchup sketchup
User avatar
By Duncan
#93632
oz42 wrote:C'mon guys, where's the XSI plugin?

Everyone know that's the most sought after!
Damn straight !!! Bring on the XSI plug.

I was told it would be worth buying now, this was at the

beginning of 2005 and I would have it in June 2005 LOL hahaha what a joke.

Now they don't even want to work on an XSI plug.

Well lets hope they change there mind.
User avatar
By tom
#93753
Becco_UK wrote:Fluffy: according to Tom only a few hours are needed to make a plugin!This is a reply of his to someone that I came across in another thread:

"Hi *******,

Thank you for contacting! All the team was concentrated on the application for the last days.
Plugins are really not hard to make and it's just a matter of few hours free time.
So please don't worry about them, we will provide them ASAP in some days.
Currently there are vital issues as you know But we didn't forget plugins

Cheers,
Atilla Akin // Tom
Next Limit Technologies"
:lol: :lol: :lol: I bored to explain this everyhere really.
Here "to make" means not completely building a plugin from the start. I tried to mean making them compatible to new MXS. Is easier to understand now? :D
By Becco_UK
#93756
Tom: I understand quite clear what is going on. You do too. :wink:
User avatar
By tom
#93771
Becco_UK wrote:Tom: I understand quite clear what is going on. You do too. :wink:
So why do you carry "a part" of specific answer in your signature for misleading people. :lol:
By Becco_UK
#93782
Tom: Thank you for pointing that out. As you now see I have ammended the signature. More clear for all, yes?
User avatar
By tom
#93784
Becco_UK wrote:Tom: Thank you for pointing that out. As you now see I have ammended the signature. More clear for all, yes?
Hahahah.. you're missing the point here. The question was asking a plugin update not a new plugin. But this way it seems like making an unexisting plugin is the same. Come on.... :lol: Tank, I need an X-IT fast.

So, is this a known issue?

Thanks a lot for your response, I will update and […]

did you tried luxCore?