Add here your best high-quality Maxwell images.
By DELETED
#45094
DELETED
User avatar
By victor
#45109
I think that the dark side of the earth should be darker, there's not much of ambient light out there.
User avatar
By Maximus3D
#45124
Pretty well done Falcon :)

If i'm allowed to say i'm missing something in this otherwise great rendering. Citylights visible during the night in the dark parts of the planet, also as Victor said it's too bright in the dark parts, and another not-so-typical-Photoshop lensflare (hehe) and less strength in the bump on the landsurfaces ;)

But it's fun to see something else than archi renderings by Maxwell for once, i kinda got bored from all those indoor and houses/office buildings renderings now. This is more refreshing :)

I forgot to include this link, it might help you.. http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/BlueMarble/

/ Max
Last edited by Maximus3D on Tue Jul 12, 2005 12:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By otacon
#45125
Cool. i was wondering when someone would do a space scene.
By falconking
#45130
:D Thanks guys. Thanks maximus. I got the textures from that site. In fact, the color map from earth is a 21k pixels tiiff converted to jpg. same fro the bump, opacity and clouds textures. the reason for not having lights in the night side, is because this is earth 1,000,000 years ago. :)
User avatar
By Intuition
#45414
I haven't tried space yet with Maxwell.

I think the transparacy maps are the trouble. When they are fixed I may be able to get correct atmosphere effects.

http://vbulletin.newtek.com/showthread. ... real+earth

Did this one a year ago with Lightwave.

Maxwell should be able to produce similar results with transparacny mapping fixed.


I think its awesome someone finally took the first space step with MW. :D
User avatar
By ludi
#45429
by the way, just as a square link:
do you know :
http://earth.google.com

Its ABSOLUTE incredible try it out. It´s still a public beta, but as i know, here in the Forum we all like beta´s :D

greex Ludi
By iandavis
#45435
bump is too extreme...

check this out:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GP ... 001067.jpg

that image was taken much, much closer to the surface and the ANDES mountians are little tiny bumps... the coast is flat as a pancake... your bump map should be .0001% or something to that end.

it's damn near impossible to do proper earth images without the ability to do transparency via map.

also, there are ocean/land reflection maps available, that would add realism too... if the oceans had specular...
Help with swimming pool water

I think you posted a while back that its best to u[…]

Sketchup 2026 Released

Considering how long a version for Sketchup 2025 t[…]

Greetings, One of my users with Sketchup 2025 (25[…]

Maxwell Rhino 5.2.6.8 plugin with macOS Tahoe 26

Good morning everyone, I’d like to know if t[…]