End date: May 13
By junaidrashid
Maxwell challenges are always fun and learning oppurtunity is maxiumum.
Here is how i set up the scene using the information as discussed in the forum here.


But strangely, i always get mis-matched shadow and few pixels always misbehave. i tried different object and aligned them properly with base plane. But when i add shadows in post-production test.. it always fails (like image above).

Another (possibly dumb) question, how can i attach image in this post?? So far i have to host it on flickr.
User avatar
By Mihai
I don't understand, it's pretty clearly stated on that page:
By default when you choose to render a shadow pass, any visible objects in the render will become fully white in the shadow channel, thus obscuring parts of the shadow channel. This is done in order to be able to render both the main render and a shadow channel at the same time. It can however cause problems when compositing this knocked out kind of shadow pass with objects that have been cut out from the background using an alpha channel. You may see a few faint white pixels along the borders of the object and the shadow pass, depending on the brightness of your background and the objects.

The solution is to render a separate shadow pass with full shadows simply by hiding to camera all the objects in the scene and rendering only the shadow channel (all other channels off including the main render).
Which part is not explained?
By junaidrashid
Thanks for your reply. I can totally understand. But compare to this
In your compositing application (image or video compositor), the shadow channel should be placed in a layer between the main render channel and your background, and set to Multiply blending mode. This will render invisible any white areas of the shadow pas
The above gives details of how to do it in compositing software (e.g. PS) using Knocked out shadow pass. i.e. Multiply.
Anyways, i 'll try to search it out it what to do with separate shadow pass e.g. Simple multiply will work??
User avatar
By Mihai
It's the same procedure, you still get a shadow pass image which you have to composite in PS as described in your quote. It's just that the shadow pass will look different - look at that page again to compare what knocked-out vs full shadow pass looks like.

We don't use Revit but you might like to try some […]

Multiple surfaces on object

I guess you are asking about chanching a material […]

New Develepments for 5.2?

Some areas that need addressing One why can't we[…]

..... help please ..... :mrgreen: