- Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:26 pm
#360702
In the meantime you might watch this Clip here to understand why a subdivision of 128 or 10000 as you have tried
in previous posts is absolutely not feasable. The respective fields should not even allow such absurd input.
Can it be that you have a CAD-background and normally don't deal with Subdivision-Surfaces?
A Rhino-User in this thread even posted a test by having dialed in 0.1 for subdivision. That's utter nonsense too.
NL could already avoid by adjusting the Slider-Input-range but I think they should introduce a little subdivision-surfaces-introduction
in their help-file too. They assume basic knowledge which is not always given.
Messing up entirely with displacement is something we CAD-People run into much more likely. Users dealing with meshes all
day are much more aware of how dividing geometry affects performance.
in previous posts is absolutely not feasable. The respective fields should not even allow such absurd input.
Can it be that you have a CAD-background and normally don't deal with Subdivision-Surfaces?
A Rhino-User in this thread even posted a test by having dialed in 0.1 for subdivision. That's utter nonsense too.
NL could already avoid by adjusting the Slider-Input-range but I think they should introduce a little subdivision-surfaces-introduction
in their help-file too. They assume basic knowledge which is not always given.
Messing up entirely with displacement is something we CAD-People run into much more likely. Users dealing with meshes all
day are much more aware of how dividing geometry affects performance.