[newmain]

and by the way im a lover of maxwell ..thats why i did this post

[fuso]

hard to believe, but anyway where is that difference in quality you're talking about all the time?? The quality is obviously better in the beta ones. They're simply a bit brighter. That is easz to adjust now in almost
REALTIME. Give me another render engine which can do that. Tweaking
shutter speed and monitor gamma a bit and you're done. Please!

[Mihai]

If you would take 10 minutes to read new posts when you log in, you would know there have been quite a few posts about a blur issue regarding beta. All those posts slipped by you?

There is a blur issue and it will be fixed, other than that, I don't know what you are talking about. Why didn't you post your concerns in the thread you linked the pic from? Why start two completely meaningless threads, one in the gallery??

I really like logging in and having to read 50 topics and only 15 of them have any real info.....

efficiency.....saves us all time...

[Micha]

hard to believe, but anyway where is that difference in quality you're talking about all the time?? The quality is obviously better in the beta ones. They're simply a bit brighter. That is easz to adjust now in almost
REALTIME. Give me another render engine which can do that. Tweaking
shutter speed and monitor gamma a bit and you're done. Please!

I can do it since months with Rhinoman|AIR. Also the AIR Framebuffer collect all rendered images, - could be good for Maxwell also.

[Becco_UK]

The problem that seems apparent in the comparison images is the change of detail between alpha and beta. This is probably down to the introduction of slight blurring in the beta version which is expected to soon be fixed.