patch 2.01 render compared to 2.00

20 posts

Re: patch 2.01 render compared to 2.00#313506

By tom - Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:53 pm

- Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:53 pm #313506

Miguel Piñón wrote:And seems to me is more real the caustics in v. 2.00 than in 2.01, for example the caustics reflected by the chrome leg from the chairs lounge....... cos in the same area the 2.01 don´t reflect any caustic, but maybe I´m wrong.

Don't worry Miguel, 2.0 was making overbright caustics from sun and inclined emitters. It was a bug and now fixed.

Next Limit Team

Re: patch 2.01 render compared to 2.00#313518

By Miguel Piñón - Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:50 am

- Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:50 am #313518

Tom now is totally clear !!!.....

Thanks for your time and help, I have learned very much from you since the beta phase.

Wishes!

Re: patch 2.01 render compared to 2.00#313564

By PA3K - Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:06 pm

- Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:06 pm #313564

I tried to measure test picture from Tom, and yes - caustic from glass table in 2.0 is even brighter (116,115,110) than surrounding surface without caustic (103,101,103) - this is UNREAL, because glass plane is not focusing sun rays. In V 2.0.1 - there is caustic (93,95,97) and near surface (103,101,103) - measured in PS with colour picker - sample size - 5 by 5 average.
Patrik

Re: patch 2.01 render compared to 2.00#313726

By wow001 - Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:39 pm

- Mon Nov 02, 2009 1:39 pm #313726

Hi Tom,
You where right.
Both shots rendered for 3.5 hours.
2.01 is resolved more even though the SL and Benchmarks where lower.

Render reached SL15 with version 2.00