- Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:18 pm
#306442
great news. I just hope that the 2.0 upgrade isn't too expensive since I just paid for VRay for Maya to replace Mental Ray for my quick renders.
I didn't think it was going to happen either!Maximus3D wrote:I'm glad to see i was now proven wrong about IES for Maxwell.
/ Max
macray wrote:IES in Maxwell still sounds strange - but it is measured by the companies, so it's physically real and therefore Maxwell can use it?!
Sounds strange and really like a lame excuse but a great feature will be there in future and I cannot wait to play with it!
I wouldn't have thought this possible - but looks like the reality strikes back.
That's exactly what I meant. You can do it. I did it myselves several times. Not that it was fun, but it works as it should without any external data.Cadhorn wrote: .... If you're thinking it's a better idea to model the light fixture + emitter to exactly match the real world output... I strongly disagree. I've been down that road half a dozen times on different architecture rendering jobs. Trust me it's no fun making super-detailed models of reflectors and emitters just to get a simple (and typical) light pattern on a wall....
Thanks a lot for your response, I will update and […]