- Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:45 am
#296065
I just listened to the second film, and it's a bit frustrating. He senses a problem related to money, and rightly so. But I do not believe that money and commerce are the problem. Commerce is obviously nothing more than you and I agreeing to trade with one another, and neglecting the possible aspect of force or fraud, it is implicit that the transaction must be mutually-beneficial. Money is simply a medium; it is a temporary and easily-transferred placeholder for value; a storehouse whose contents represent time previously invested. As such, the attempt in the film to to demonize money itself strikes me as being very similar to the practice of some other parties who condemn similarly-inert concepts on religious grounds. Unfortunately, this prevents realization of one of the more important corrective ideas available, which is: we need to institute freedom of money. Legal tender, while seemingly natural due to universal conditioning, is a fraudulent and fabricated concept; to expect that such a power, once granted, will not be abused absolutely is to me, completely irrational.
The rest of the video is, imho, both inaccurate and hopelessly utopian.
Next Limit Team