Everything related to http://resources.maxwellrender.com
User avatar
By KurtS
#228629
it is very naive to think that this symbol does not have any political meaning. The swastika is for almost every civilized person synonymous to nazism, and the material should be removed at once. Of course the symbol is far older than the nazism, but thet does not change anything.

and remember: the swastika is forbidden in Germany - so if you even think of having German customers in the future: remove it!



http://www.i-jeriko.de/2006/04/28/the-s ... every-way/
User avatar
By Maximus3D
#228630
I agree with Kurt, it's so obvious what it's meant to be it should be removed.
If it would be Swastika then the symbol would look slightly different aswell, now in that material it doesn't, it has the modern Nazi type interpetation which is wrong and offensive to some people.

/ Max
By Polyxo
#228658
KurtS wrote:it is very naive to think that this symbol does not have any political meaning. The swastika is for almost every civilized person synonymous to nazism, and the material should be removed at once.
Can't agree more. Please remove this material, which shows the symbol of inhumanism! This is not funny at all.

Holger
By vinys
#228674
beatriz wrote:Hello Vinys,

look at the keywords, I'm sure there is no political intention that can cause offense in this material.
Hy beatriz,

i disagree here. I think this symbol is of a political nature and stands for racism, crime and inhumanity.

Please remove it!

Thank you.
By tokiop
#228679
Would you ban the millenar christian cross if a chineese mass murderer used it as a symbol for it's politic 50 years ago ?

Personaly i'm with Beatriz's point of view, let's not do europeo-centrists neologisms. Anyway I guess Zhu can understand and change it for a Wikepedia-like round svatika or keep his materials for himself if some can't stop looking at this webpage.

I'm more hurted by currents killings and let-them-dying actions still going-on all arround the world.

Peace !
User avatar
By x_site
#228680
... while at it lets remove any materials referring to silly mustaches....
Are you guys serious? It is naive to not associate any political meaning to this material?!!!!!...
By Polyxo
#228682
beatriz wrote:Hello Vinys,

look at the keywords, I'm sure there is no political intention that can cause offense in this material.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika

Hi beatriz,

maybe you scroll a bit further down in the source you provided:

"Taboo in Western countries
Because of its use by Hitler and the Nazis and, in modern times, by neo-Nazis and other hate groups, for many people in the West, the swastika is associated primarily with Nazism and white supremacy. Hence, outside historical contexts, it has become taboo in Western countries"


Germany
The German postwar criminal code makes the public showing of the Hakenkreuz (the swastika) and other Nazi symbols illegal and punishable, except for scholarly reasons. It is even censored from the lithographs on boxes of model kits, and the decals that come in the box. The swastikas on Hindu and Jain temples are exempt, as religious symbols cannot be banned in Germany. It has been proposed that this law be applied to all of the European Union.[38]

A German fashion company was investigated for using traditional British-made folded leather buttons after complaints that they resembled swastikas. In response, Esprit destroyed two hundred thousand catalogues.[39][40]

A controversy was stirred by the decision of several police departments to begin inquiries against anti-fascists.[41] In late 2005 police raided the offices of the punklabel and mailorder "Nix Gut Records" and confiscated merchandise depicting crossed-out swastikas and fists smashing swastikas.[42] In 2006 the Stade police department started an inquiry against anti-fascist youths using a placard, depicting a person dumping a swastika into a trashcan. The placard was displayed in opposition to the campaign of right-wing nationalist parties for local elections.[43]

On Friday, March 17, 2006 a member of the Bundestag Claudia Roth reported herself to the German police for displaying a crossed-out swastika on multiple demonstrations against Neo-Nazis, and subsequently got the Bundestag to suspend her immunity from prosecution. She intended to show the absurdity of charging anti-fascists with using fascist symbols: "We don't need prosecution of non-violent young people engaging against right-wing extremism."[42]

The relevant excerpt[44] of the German criminal code reads:

§ 86 StGB Dissemination of Means of Propaganda of Unconstitutional Organizations

(1) Whoever domestically disseminates or produces, stocks, imports or exports or makes publicly accessible through data storage media for dissemination domestically or abroad, means of propaganda:

1. of a party which has been declared to be unconstitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court or a party or organization, as to which it has been determined, no longer subject to appeal, that it is a substitute organization of such a party; […]

4. means of propaganda, the contents of which are intended to further the aims of a former National Socialist organization, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine. […]

(3) Subsection (1) shall not be applicable if the means of propaganda or the act serves to further civil enlightenment, to avert unconstitutional aims, to promote art or science, research or teaching, reporting about current historical events or similar purposes. […]

§ 86a StGB Use of Symbols of Unconstitutional Organizations

(1) Whoever:

1. domestically distributes or publicly uses, in a meeting or in writings (§ 11 subsection (3)) disseminated by him, symbols of one of the parties or organizations indicated in § 86 subsection (1), nos. 1, 2 and 4; or

2. produces, stocks, imports or exports objects which depict or contain such symbols for distribution or use domestically or abroad, in the manner indicated in number 1,

shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine.

(2) Symbols, within the meaning of subsection (1), shall be, in particular, flags, insignia, uniforms, slogans and forms of greeting. Symbols which are so similar as to be mistaken for those named in sentence 1 shall be deemed to be equivalent thereto. […]

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
User avatar
By KurtS
#228683
thanks a lot for removing it!
User avatar
By x_site
#228684
this is hard to believe... they actually remove it!!!
Be afraid ... be very afraid!!! :shock:
By Polyxo
#228687
x_site wrote:... while at it lets remove any materials referring to silly mustaches....
Are you guys serious? It is naive to not associate any political meaning to this material?!!!!!...
Tasteless.
By Polyxo
#228688
x_site wrote:this is hard to believe... they actually remove it!!!
Be afraid ... be very afraid!!! :shock:
Even more.
User avatar
By x_site
#228689
yeah i know... i am not a fan of silly mustaches either...
User avatar
By juan
#228690
The autor of the material has removed it as soon he has seen that it was being offensive, so we can guess his intention was not to insult anybody.

ok thanks for explaining. actually I do copy the T[…]

Sketchup 2026 Released

Fernando wrote: " Now that Maxwell for Cinema[…]

Hello Gaspare, I could test the plugin on Rhino 8[…]

Hello Blanchett, I could reproduce the problem he[…]