Not there yet? Post your work in progress here to receive feedback from the users.
By yadikrisnadi
#215716
Interior of office Lobby, please give me inputs to improvement. :o

Image

Thanks

Yadi
By Renato Lemus
#215722
Great image and design!

how long did it take?
By yadikrisnadi
#215729
Thanks Renato Lemus, I cooked for 12 hrs on Intel 6400 @ 3000x2000 pxl..
User avatar
By DrMerman
#215734
Really nice render mate :) My only crit would be the silver ring at mid-left. The material just seems somehow off, perhaps too glossy? The rest is outstanding though, and 12 hours seems more that reasonable.

Cheers,
Dr Merman
By tokiop
#215782
Very nice and smart as usual for your renders! 8)
User avatar
By mverta
#215790
Input to improve? Okay... like 99.9% of architectural renders in here, it's WAY too perfect. I know it's supposed to be new, and clean, and pristine, but in the real world, new/clean/pristine still has about a billion variations in tone to colors, scuff marks from an errant ladder footprint, corner not quite squared off because the workmen did it at 4:58 on Friday, etc.

Your materials are decent, and if this is what the client wants, then who cares?

_Mike
User avatar
By Leonardo
#215808
I would expected the background pic and the car to be more overexposed.

It looks dead without people too.
By rusteberg
#215862
i think leonardo is on a mission to put people in renders today :lol:

looks nice to me. then again, i don't have an immaculate r2d2 rendering under my belt.
By yadikrisnadi
#215934
sandykoufax, thanks.
DrMerman, yes its too glossy my better to put cooper then?
tokiop, thanks.
mverta, yes corners are too sharp, I ll refined the model. Thnaks Mike.
Leonardo, original render was over expose for background & people hmm.. ..I dont have nice people what I have only from AXYZ desgin. Thanks Leo.
Leonardo :lol: :lol:
User avatar
By michaelplogue
#215950
I like the fact that you included the chairs behind the reception desk - which you can see in the reflection on the marble behind. Most people would have left them out as they couldn't be seen directly from the camera, in order to reduce their poly count. Nice touch!

I agree with Leonardo... I think the back could use a good overexposure - even though the interior lighting indicates a more 'dusk' or overcloudy exterior. I'm thinking you could benefit from two renders: One lit only with a very bright daylight, and the other a night time shot to show off the interior lighting.

I hope you don't mind, but I did a little photoshopping just to give it a bit more dramatic lighting.... :oops:

Image
By yadikrisnadi
#215958
Thanks michaelplogue, indeed thats more dramatic. I like it.
By yadikrisnadi
#216139
Thanks Vodka79, the emiter is box 4x4x30 cm.
By Mr Whippy
#216268
Did you use glare?

Also, the exterior as said is too dull for the interior exposure you'd have used there. Even a grey overcast sky outside windows when exposing for your average indoor shot will blow out quite alot!

I think the edited version is getting there, mainly because the brightest parts are whiter.

If you blow out the background and then alter the white balance manually to get things that looked white white it will be alot nicer.

Note: Maxwell NEEDS white balance :)


Generally though, lovely work!

Dave

I don't think that in 2 years AI will be precise l[…]

Help with swimming pool water

Hi Andreas " I would say the above "fake[…]