17 minutes... man...

Now ! .... we are talking good.ivox3 wrote:I am happy to report that all is right in the world today.
Yes, good idea. Although with prices changing so often you would need to constantly update it. It's nice to see in the case of ivox 8 core, an almost 100% scaling.michaelplogue wrote: Now, in the chart, we need to have a price per benchmark ratio......... Take the total cost for the computer at the time of purchase, and divide it by the benchmark number. The smaller the figure, the better "bang for the buck" (BFB) value....
I think it has to do with balancing of the memory sticks. They have to be in pairs (both slot 1 and 3 for example) so that the CPU can function optimally .. but that was on AMD systems, so I am not 100% sure on this.michaelplogue wrote:OK.. I have a question. I haven't run the test scene recently, but I can't imagine that it commits a huge amount of memory. So (in theory) as long as you had enough free RAM to cover the commit charge of a single instance of MXCL - regardless of how many cores you have - I wouldn't expect to see any difference by adding more RAM. Or am i wrong and each core commits equal amounts of memory?
I would have thought that 2GB of RAM should have been more that sufficient in rendering the scene without having to access VM on the hard drive. Why would adding more RAM have had such an increase in speed?