- Fri May 05, 2006 12:16 am
#150261
I think to have glare as a number field (0-100+) NOT a slider would
A) let you have a specific Glare internsity to remember and reuse over many different images or reuse that value on same image later on a rerender(as a slider you have to jsut hope you get it in the ballpart, slider isn't presise either...)
B)maybe slider elimination would decrease "memory leak" effect ppl experience
C)a numeric value would be awsome if you need to bump up glare to 100+ in cases where 100 isnt what the preview to refreshed looks like-- you can still Bump up value to 150 to get desired result..
ALSO>>>>
glare to be launched via comand line or via plugin..
ie:
mxcl.exe -mxs:myfile.mxs -g:90,c:\apeture.jpg,c:\obstical.jpg
or no apature just obstical:
mxcl.exe -mxs:myfile.mxs -g:90,0,c:\obstical.jpg
A) let you have a specific Glare internsity to remember and reuse over many different images or reuse that value on same image later on a rerender(as a slider you have to jsut hope you get it in the ballpart, slider isn't presise either...)
B)maybe slider elimination would decrease "memory leak" effect ppl experience
C)a numeric value would be awsome if you need to bump up glare to 100+ in cases where 100 isnt what the preview to refreshed looks like-- you can still Bump up value to 150 to get desired result..
ALSO>>>>
glare to be launched via comand line or via plugin..
ie:
mxcl.exe -mxs:myfile.mxs -g:90,c:\apeture.jpg,c:\obstical.jpg
or no apature just obstical:
mxcl.exe -mxs:myfile.mxs -g:90,0,c:\obstical.jpg
Last edited by 3dtrialpractice on Fri May 05, 2006 1:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- By jurX
- By Jochen Haug