- Mon Feb 11, 2008 10:56 pm
#260997
Now let me get this clear people. Kerkythea doesn't suck and it's a great renderer. The gallery sucks for many other reasons than the renderer quality. It's the fault the users so stop acting like dumb kids. When I read these posts I seriously have the feeling that some people do 3d graphics for like 2 months and never seen a different renderer than Maxwell.
mtripoli : Do you realize that that kerkythea image was rendered with a totally different technique? And newsflash.. Kerkythea also does bipt, MLT and even dispersion. So it's really capable of producing an image that comes very close to your Maxwell version. So download kerkythea, use the right rendering/GI method and voila.. you might get suprised.
And advocating for a biased renderer. That's nonsense. If you want to have biased renderings purchase Vray. I'm pro unbias but probably against all that "physically corectness" which is alot of times heavily depends on the ability to interpret stuff written in papers. Maxwell is still so physically-correct that it suffers darkening around the edges on reflective materials (if you don't believe me just render a shiny aluminium ball in a grey cornell box. Tadaaaa. Very physically incorrect
. Alot of other renderers solved that already (I counted 4)
What we need is just more tweaks and more features. But still in the unbiased range.
mtripoli : Do you realize that that kerkythea image was rendered with a totally different technique? And newsflash.. Kerkythea also does bipt, MLT and even dispersion. So it's really capable of producing an image that comes very close to your Maxwell version. So download kerkythea, use the right rendering/GI method and voila.. you might get suprised.
And advocating for a biased renderer. That's nonsense. If you want to have biased renderings purchase Vray. I'm pro unbias but probably against all that "physically corectness" which is alot of times heavily depends on the ability to interpret stuff written in papers. Maxwell is still so physically-correct that it suffers darkening around the edges on reflective materials (if you don't believe me just render a shiny aluminium ball in a grey cornell box. Tadaaaa. Very physically incorrect
What we need is just more tweaks and more features. But still in the unbiased range.
Look into my blue jellyfish of love and let your spirit be adaptively displaced



- By Mark Bell