[markps]

Am I the only one who doesn't understand the point of this "Vector Art?" Like, he copied a picture of Keira Knightley in Illustrator... and the point is? I mean, what we do pre-visualizes something. What they're doing proves they're great at copying. Not that I'm trying to downplay the amount of skill involved in what they do, I just don't see the point.

Side note, the mesh I see next to the picture... is there a way to convert that into something we can use in 3D? I just ask because, you know, having Keira 3D...

Well if you analyze this way.. everything we do can be a waste of time in some point of view...

I think the big deal of vector art is that:

1 - it takes a long time

2 - The result image is smooth and can be resized to a bilboard size without aliasing.

3 - It is impossible to make it look as real as on those pictures

4 - Or maybe it is simply foolish to spent that much effort on something that already exists ;o)

[EONA]

Well if you analyze this way.. everything we do can be a waste of time in some point of view...

I think the big deal of vector art is that:

1 - it takes a long time

2 - The result image is smooth and can be resized to a bilboard size without aliasing.

3 - It is impossible to make it look as real as on those pictures

4 - Or maybe it is simply foolish to spent that much effort on something that already exists ;o)

Now.... how about a render engine that produces vector images . Hell size will not be a problem anymore