[macray]

Hi all,

We know the current limitations of the plugin and the team is working to fix it asap. (In fact this months we are mainly focused in improving all the plugins, you will see that in next updates). Our C4 testers are giving us very good feedback and we are pretty confident we will get success soon.

Kind regards,

Juan

That sounds good.

[noseman]

That sounds good

We have been listening to "things that sound good" for over one and a half year.

Don't you think it's time to "see something good"?

[macray]

I know - bought it last april. But as long as there is something happening - it is good. Better than stopping the support, don't you think?

[noseman]

But as long as there is something happening - it is good. Better than stopping the support, don't you think?

What's happening?
and em... err... what support are you talking about?

The worst thing that can happen is NL to file for bankruptcy. Until then... enjoy their absence.

[Rochr]

...Next Limit gives support... hahaha

A good one macray, but a somewhat late April fools joke.

[seco7]

Yeah, I was looking back at the old threads on this same topic ... at least those that still exist ... and it kills me how little love NL has given its customers (specifically to me the C4D problems).

Honestly, I don't want to get into the old arguements again, but even after all this time I would still take a refund if NL changed its policies, that's how little hope I have left; no offence to those who are using Maxwell/C4D and have success with it.

[macray]

...Next Limit gives support... hahaha

A good one macray, but a somewhat late April fools joke.

I knew you'd appreciate some jokes to loosen the bad mood here.

[Rochr]

Personally i would also like to see exactly what kind of scenes the testers are testing the plugin with. (considering that someone actually thought that deleting camera selection and tripple tagging every material was such a great idea...)

[noseman]

do you think they are furiously testing it because they are concerned about us?
he he... no way.

[Rochr]

Who, me?
Naahh, it would just be slightly reassuring to know that they test the plugin with a little more complex scenes than two shiny plastic spheres and a brick wall.

At least that would explain why someone would find V1.1 to be a workflow-wonder...

[Rochr]

Old image made for another company, but i believe it may apply just fine here as well...

[thomas lacroix]

roflmao

[seco7]

Banana Time!

Love it!

[dyarza]

LOL!!

In all seriousness. I have been in the "lets give NL the beneffit of the doubt" camp now for over a year now. For no other reason other than I love M~R and what it can do, and to me it sems that it will all be worth it in the end.

However, I agree that it has been long enough and patience running thing is not an unreasonable reaction here.

Like a lot of people here I purchased M~R to use with C4D based on the premise of a working plug-in as stated by NL from the beggining.

If NL abandon this strategy at any point and make it clear that Studio is the only way to go, sign me up for the refund. I have no interest in Studio.

About your beta testers on the plug-in... NL, you have a bunch op users on these forums telling you exactly what does not work and what features we want, we're all your beta testers.

D

[Rizon]

Amazing... after givng up on NL for a long time still nothing... i wonder how many of the people that bought the software actually use it...

Pray 4 Vray.