Add here your best high-quality Maxwell images.
User avatar
By Micha
#58782
Hi,

Maxwell rendering makes fun. So, I'm looking on my harddisk for some "old" models and try give it a new live in Maxwell.

Texturing is no fun in Rhino now, so anything looks a little bit new. I add a little bit extra noise per composite with Rhinoman|AIR to the chasis.
Rendertime: 1300x960 - 10h SL16

Should I add a beer crown cap. :wink:

Image
Last edited by Micha on Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By NicoR44
#58787
Hi Micha,

great looking drill!!
what did you use to create those gears?
User avatar
By Micha
#58788
Thank you.

I have used the parametric CAD Pro/Desktop, it was a free sister from Pro/Engineer. But I think, you can use the great gear script from Thomas An. . You can find it on the McNeel plugin pages.
User avatar
By Frances
#58815
Nice work Micha. What was your lens length on that camera? Maybe a little more of the overall drill could be in focus.
User avatar
By x_site
#58825
:: i also advise to change the floor board width as it makes it look quite small. Your scale looks a bit off [might be the camera settings]. Looks very nice::
By rendertaxi
#58829
great image! i like the lighting/reflections and the materials...
User avatar
By tom
#58842
Good model but high dof ;)
User avatar
By 4 HeRo
#58857
nice model and lighting but "damn that dof" :wink:
User avatar
By Micha
#58858
Thank you for the comments and suggestions. :)

My fstop was 1, because in the preview the DOF effect has looked so small and I love stronger DOF, but now ... the drill looks to small. I render it with a real world fstop value 1.8 again. Yours eyes are very good. :wink:

x_site: the texture is from a big outdoor oak table and the size should be ok, but you are right. The experience of the most people is, that a wood board is max. approx. 4 hands wide and not 6. And in my image is the limited wide not sure to see. I change it in my new rendering. :)
User avatar
By jotero
#58888
very nice :)
By iandavis
#58920
There is nothing to comment on (being that it's all pretty much perfect) except the DOF>

General rule of thumb. If you get extreme depth of field it's due to getting CLOSE to an object, which implies immediately that it is a small object. The problem here, is that for a normal camera in normal lighting f1.0 would be impossible, that is without something like 16,000th of a second, or perhaps ISO12 film.

Something photographed with a low f-stop, which in my book is anything below f4 means low light. And low light photos have a distinctive look.

The reason the drill looks so small is that in order to reproduce your rendering with a real lense is to photograph a 4" drill with daylight levels of light, really close. also keep in mind that there is only one lense (that I know of) that actually has f1.0 (canon 50mm f1) Your much safer to stick to f4, since that's' the common f-stop for consumer zoom lenses. Maxwell is accurate enough that this in itself should self-regulate any unnatural looking DOF effects in your images. In fact, I would recommend not going below f8, which is what I try to do with all product photos.

Example of appropraite levels of DOF in an extreme closup:
http://www.iandavis.ws/display_image.asp?PictureID=516

Examples of a full frame object SMALLER then your drill:
http://www.iandavis.ws/display_image.asp?PictureID=525


Depth of field is somewhat of a pet peeve of mine. Being a photographer I know that extreme depth of field is something I (and most photographers) strive to avoid in average product shots. Depth of field is actually used to bring into focus (sorry for the pun) an area of the object, and exclude others. Or to knock out an ugly background from a subject you are photographing. We should NEVER see depth blur on larger objects like full frame car renders, or any product that doesn't break the edge of frame.

Depth blur IS appropriate for extreme closeups, but should be managed to include all important aspects of the object you are trying to 'photograph'

Sometimes it's not possible to avoid, but in my experience it's only been an issue when photographing insects or other such things which need to be shot that close to the lense (less then a foot). Objects 1-3 feet in size as a rule are completely in focus.

DOF effects are like fonts used to be during the desktop publishing revolution... Look I CAN use 30 fonts... so I will.. Now that DOF is possible and easy, EVERYONE is using it. It's just wrong. wrong wrong...

It's a good idea if there is any question, just find a photo and see how an object like yours IS photographed.

cheers



:)
User avatar
By Micha
#58938
IanDavis, thank you for a so long lecture about DOF here. It focus my mind on this subject. :)
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#58952
Great image.

I agree with the other comment; the wood plunk is so large that makes the drill look like a miniature.

Is it really that small ?

-
By iandavis
#58964
sorry guys... i tend to write a lot.

no offense intended to be sure... just trying to help.

:oops:
Help with swimming pool water

I think you posted a while back that its best to u[…]

Sketchup 2026 Released

Considering how long a version for Sketchup 2025 t[…]

Greetings, One of my users with Sketchup 2025 (25[…]

Maxwell Rhino 5.2.6.8 plugin with macOS Tahoe 26

Good morning everyone, I’d like to know if t[…]