My Maxwell Image

My Maxwell Image#9140

By Sirenesoong - Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:55 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:55 am #9140

http://www.mosaicastudio.com/maxwell/

bye
g.

#9142

By DELETED - Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:59 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:59 am #9142

DELETED

#9143

By Para - Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:00 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:00 am #9143

That's 6.9 days. A bit much.

btw there's no such thing as "Athlon64 3.4GHz", the 3400+ is so called PR rating of the processor and doesn't reflect to megahertzes - I know since I own one of those myself

The real MHz of that processor is 2.4GHz.

#9144

By iker - Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:03 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:03 am #9144

W:shock:W!! W:shock:W!! W:shock:W!!

Is there any chance to see the high res. image?

#9147

By rivoli - Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:45 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:45 am #9147

the image really looks clean and noisless, one week render sounds a bit scary though.

#9175

By Jason Jacobs - Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:02 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 4:02 am #9175

Very nice image. However, I'm confused as to why this particular scene took 7 days to each sample level 17! It doesnt seem all that complicated. (no offense intended) I dont know much about Athlon processors, so is it because of your processor speed?

#9185

By Ric_535 - Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:12 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 5:12 am #9185

very nice but as the others said loooooong render time even for Maxwell

#9214

By tom - Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:14 am

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:14 am #9214

full of satisfaction!

Next Limit Team

#9227

By Sirenesoong - Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:22 pm

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:22 pm #9227

I Agree. Time render is exaggerated and the scene is no that complicated and I believe that AMD Athlon is a speed processor.
For the same image at 640x480 the time render is 18h for sample at 21... mah
ps: sorry for my English

g.

#9237

By heiki - Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:49 pm

- Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:49 pm #9237

Very very clean render seams to be on this resolution. It would be great though if you could post at least a pice of the original render.

#9822

By andronikos916 - Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:39 am

- Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:39 am #9822

nice rendering! post full resolution plz...

cy,
A

http://www.ixor3d.com
VFX & 3D Anim
Renderfarm Monitor & Control Software

#10097

By DELETED - Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:25 pm

- Tue Mar 15, 2005 9:25 pm #10097

DELETED

#10209

By Brett Morgan - Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:17 pm

- Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:17 pm #10209

very nice render, you must be very patient

Brett

PS: A higher res would be nice too

Brett

Always glad Dyslexics Have More Nuf

#10242

By Guest - Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:24 pm

- Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:24 pm #10242

THIS IS NOT RENDERED IN MAXWELL

Actualy, I'm posting this just as an optimist note, because this image was rendered in aproximately 100 hours at 1600x1200 in V-Ray 0.5 back in 2002 when it was in it's early beta stage. Of course, I know how much the image sucks, but...

All I mean to say is how much space for improvement in speed there is for Maxwell.

And, excellent image Sirenesoong! Please show us the hi res image.

Regards,

Nenad

p.s. Sorry, I'm not willing to hijack this thread.