Add here your best high-quality Maxwell images.
User avatar
By tom
#36985
Place here your .mxs without car and wall maps,
just demonstrating the same material sphere (orange).
Don't easily say "these are your opinions" and escape.
By sqwall
#37003
OK guys i will post the .mxs but later now I am at work. I want to ask you just one thing.

I ve posted this image at CGTalk, DeviantART and other local 3D forums I again credited that the image is made using Maxwell Render. Please tell me what is the reason to lie at the other places too?

At my job we use MR at home I have all the available renders for max and I test them and use them in off company projects. So tell me what is my motivation to lie about this image?

I am not trying to offend someone or to do harm.
Just wanted to share the image with you.

Thats All
Last edited by sqwall on Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
By tom
#37004
we don't know why sqwall...
but i'm sure about one thing that you can't have that car noisefree at SL 16.
does this make sense?
and i'll be glad if you can prove it,
our words are not important but
your .mxs will set the end.
User avatar
By x_site
#37064
:: here here... i second that::
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#37079
I think we will be waiting for a long time... this is not a Maxwell scene.
User avatar
By bpositive
#37081
Wow man. That render is awsome. Great job.

I do believe the render is made ín maxwell. If you look at the reflections on the fog-lights, they look very maxwell. You can see that they reflect the physical sky. But anyway, its just an envious joke of you made a better picture than the rest... :) congrats.
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#37087
Vray has had black clipping artifacts like this.

Also the light distribution inside the cabin and in the dark indirect areas doesn't look right.

If this is Maxwell, then I don't like the lighting setup. Sorry.

The modeling of the car itself is nice though.
By Nicolas Rivera
#37090
Yes it is very beautiful, but Master Tom has doubts... that makes me think. :roll:
User avatar
By Mihai
#37094
bpositive wrote:
I do believe the render is made ín maxwell. If you look at the reflections on the fog-lights, they look very maxwell. You can see that they reflect the physical sky.
Could just be a standard gradient. Sorry but the shadows and light distribution just don't look right...
By n1tram
#37095
Something is off with the windows and the windshield... If they are truly this fumed (darkened) then it is impossible for us to be seeing the anti crash structure on the drivers window.
The reflection on the hood does NOT look like maxwell at all. Not even Vray. More like postwork on ps.
I have tried more than 200 scenes and have never seen that clipping thing in maxwell...

I do not know you personally, so I will never judge you. But I understand everyone else's concerns and doubts. I know that you DONT HAVE to prove anything if you dont want to... But if this is a real maxwell scene, then take this as the best of compliments:

ANYONE here will second that this is by far the best 16 sample render ever.

But its hard to ignore all those minor details that scream: Not a maxwell scene!

Even on Vray/finalrender/whatever this is a great render! My compliments!
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#37102
n1tram wrote:ANYONE here will second that this is by far the best 16 sample render ever.
No.

The light distribution seems off. The image is clean, yes, but the distribution is off.
User avatar
By tom
#37141
i can even render "you" this way, this is a lame progress on a technical forum.
you can tell lies to yourself, not to us...
if you don't believe, check what i wrote in my first post!
By siliconbauhaus
#37143
cool image mate and cleverly done

I really dont see why everyone is getting their knickers in a twist though
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 9
render engines and Maxwell

"prompt, edit, prompt" How will an AI r[…]