[WillMartin]

Hi NextLimit team!

First let me say that I like the new website a lot! Surely you are still adding to it -- and these very things ahead may be on your to do list -- but I'll toss them out here now just in case.


Seeing a page of 30 textures and having nothing but a texture name for each one... I picture down the road at least a couple of the categories having hundreds of textures. Perusing the lists of textures solely by reading their (sometimes not-very-descript) names, such as "Wood-36"... I propose the adding of a tiny, reduced-in-size portion of the sample render in front of each listing name to give some idea of the texture's appearance. If it was an image only around 16x16 pixels it would be small enough so as not to ruin your abilty to have 30 listings on a page as you have now (which is a nice thing ). Granted, such a tiny image will be worthless for determining many textures but, in the case of wood for example, let's say you wanted to chose between all of the lightest wood textures on the MXM website; having little images like that would make one's searching for them -- especially those of us who are not wood experts -- so much easier.

Surely these are on the horizon, but while I'm here: alphabetical order listing and search function (so I can get all the aluminums together one one page ).

Thanks for listening.

[kivimaki]

A classification system would also be nice (think of it as preset tags that you could add to the description).

Things such as: amount of reflection, transparency, texture, roughness, etc.

[lsega77]

I second Will and KiviMaki.

I love the idea of this site, if for nothing else than to be able to study materials and develop my own.

Classification is a must because I think Will is right on the money in his prediction that the library will not only grow but also have many version of th same material.

Luis