Not there yet? Post your work in progress here to receive feedback from the users.
By raja
#206663
attempting milk, not getting there, this is two layer material, one layer with SSS... this is confusing stuff... below are photos and ML of one test:

c&c welcome.

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by raja on Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By NicoR44
#206665
Great test, succes!!!! 8)
User avatar
By -Adrian
#206676
I think Maxwell, at this stage, is a really bad tool to achieve this kind of look.
By raja
#206680
-Adrian wrote:I think Maxwell, at this stage, is a really bad tool to achieve this kind of look.
yes, i saw the 'orange juice' thread... and other threads on SSS...not very hopeful.
By raja
#206681
NicoR44 wrote:Great test, succes!!!! 8)
thanks. not very hopeful, but will give a few attempts. Or else its fake milk. :)
User avatar
By Tim Ellis
#206779
What are you using the other bsdf layer as?

Some info from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk#Physi ... _structure
Both the fat globules and the smaller casein micelles, which are just large enough to deflect light, contribute to the opaque white color of milk.
The fat globules contain some yellow-orange carotene, enough in some breeds — Guernsey and Jersey cows, for instance — to impart a golden or "creamy" hue to a glass of milk.
The riboflavin in the whey portion of milk has a greenish color, which can sometimes be discerned in skim milk or whey products (McGee 17).
Fat-free skim milk has only the casein micelles to scatter light, and they tend to scatter shorter-wavelength blue light more than they do red, giving skim milk a bluish tint.
So depending on which milk you are trying to recreate, the bsdf layers would need match appropriately. I think I'd use three probably four layers.

Base water layer. 87.8% weight
Base fat layer (.r2 file) 3.9% weight
Base scatter layer 100%
Scatter layer 2 (milk type dependant) 8.3%

Not had chance to do any tests yet though, but that's my hypothesis & would be my starting point.

Tim.
By raja
#207165
I was using water + Color layer with SSS, to simulate water + scattering particles. The attempt was to get the scattering right, and then attempt types of milk. Will try some more tests today with more layers.

regards,
Tim Ellis wrote:What are you using the other bsdf layer as?

Some info from wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk#Physi ... _structure
Both the fat globules and the smaller casein micelles, which are just large enough to deflect light, contribute to the opaque white color of milk.
The fat globules contain some yellow-orange carotene, enough in some breeds — Guernsey and Jersey cows, for instance — to impart a golden or "creamy" hue to a glass of milk.
The riboflavin in the whey portion of milk has a greenish color, which can sometimes be discerned in skim milk or whey products (McGee 17).
Fat-free skim milk has only the casein micelles to scatter light, and they tend to scatter shorter-wavelength blue light more than they do red, giving skim milk a bluish tint.
So depending on which milk you are trying to recreate, the bsdf layers would need match appropriately. I think I'd use three probably four layers.

Base water layer. 87.8% weight
Base fat layer (.r2 file) 3.9% weight
Base scatter layer 100%
Scatter layer 2 (milk type dependant) 8.3%

Not had chance to do any tests yet though, but that's my hypothesis & would be my starting point.

Tim.
By raja
#210078
Tom's got milk, its also two layer. I did similar tests some days ago, and some new ones, time to check:

I'm trying water+scattering particles, plus extra color for testing -

Image

test with this mateial -

Image

toms milk mxm -

Image

test with toms milk mxm-

Image
User avatar
By tom
#210088
I'm not sure how you modeled the testing tube but it could be causing problems if it's not properly modeled as Thomas An. described. If you're sure it has no problem, then I need to let you know my milk material won't show something decent before SL19 ;) and the aim of 2nd layer is speculars, nothing about transparency.
By raja
#210094
hm. thanks Tom. Test tube is ok, I see what you mean by second layer. Will post when I have time for more tests.
tom wrote:I'm not sure how you modeled the testing tube but it could be causing problems if it's not properly modeled as Thomas An. described. If you're sure it has no problem, then I need to let you know my milk material won't show something decent before SL19 ;) and the aim of 2nd layer is speculars, nothing about transparency.

So, is this a known issue?