By casey
#252143
Personally, I am very happy they decided to go with augmentation rather than replacement for things like cameras and daylight and such. I think it leads to a much more stable product, because frankly, MAX is extraordinarily temperamental, especially with backwards compatibility. So I hate to be a wet blanket, but I would much rather not have in-viewport preview than have to use a special Maxwell object for things that will likely break in the future thanks to Discrete's, er, indiscretions :)

- Casey
Help with swimming pool water

Hi Andreas " I would say the above "fake[…]

render engines and Maxwell

Other rendering engines are evolving day by day, m[…]