All posts relating to Maxwell Render 1.x
User avatar
By Leonardo
#251326
Guys don't let Ron Martin discourage you....
You can still get a 4 Quad-Core X7350, 2.93GHz and Bet him up!!!
User avatar
By tom
#251338
:shock: [...then, tom's looking for exchanging a few diamond.iors]
User avatar
By Leonardo
#251345
You don't need toe xagerate that much...

this will do it!

Image
User avatar
By Tyrone Marshall
#251883
New benchmarks!

Apple Mac Pro 8 Core as of pre-1.6:

Mac Pro 8 Core OSX 10.5
SL of 15.00. Benchmark of 1106.427. Time: 9m42s
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#251888
Tyrone Marshall wrote:New benchmarks!

Apple Mac Pro 8 Core as of pre-1.6:

Mac Pro 8 Core OSX 10.5
SL of 15.00. Benchmark of 1106.427. Time: 9m42s
We should not mix the 1.6 with the 1.5 results. The benchmarks should be separate. Maybe we should wait for the admin of the Benchwell site to add a 1.6 page so that we all start anew.
User avatar
By Tyrone Marshall
#251891
Thomas An. wrote:
Tyrone Marshall wrote:New benchmarks!

Apple Mac Pro 8 Core as of pre-1.6:

Mac Pro 8 Core OSX 10.5
SL of 15.00. Benchmark of 1106.427. Time: 9m42s
We should not mix the 1.6 with the 1.5 results. The benchmarks should be separate. Maybe we should wait for the admin of the Benchwell site to add a 1.6 page so that we all start anew.
I sent Adrian an email to update the version listing. I have no problem with that.
User avatar
By -Adrian
#251934
yes, no more (1.6) entries now please. Adding 1.6 is a matter of uncommenting one line, the db already has the table, but i think i wanna add the contact and specs fields first instead of filling them our for you later. I hope you can wait a couple days and play with displacement or something, didn't see that release coming :|
User avatar
By Tyrone Marshall
#251949
-Adrian wrote:yes, no more (1.6) entries now please. Adding 1.6 is a matter of uncommenting one line, the db already has the table, but i think i wanna add the contact and specs fields first instead of filling them our for you later. I hope you can wait a couple days and play with displacement or something, didn't see that release coming :|
No problem, I am happy with the message entry here to at least show that with 1.6 the gulf between Mac and Win systems is no more of an issue and in my test of dual booting between Mac OSX 10.4.10 & 10.5 and Win XP SP2.
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#251963
Tyrone Marshall wrote:No problem, I am happy with the message entry here to at least show that with 1.6 the gulf between Mac and Win systems is no more of an issue and in my test of dual booting between Mac OSX 10.4.10 & 10.5 and Win XP SP2.
:) We don't know that.
If the other users run the tests again on 1.6 they could be faster as well all across the board thus keeping the relative position on the rankings the same.
By T_RNLDesign
#252510
I just have a core 2 duo 6600 but the x64 render time was cut in half with 1.6. pretty awesome :D
  • 1
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 37

I don't think that in 2 years AI will be precise l[…]

Help with swimming pool water

Hi Andreas " I would say the above "fake[…]