All posts relating to Maxwell Render 1.x
By Matthew Schrock
#13774
victor wrote:The performance in Mac will improve in the next days, we are doing some fine-tuning for G5. 8)

Thanks Victor..... :D :D :D


Matthew
By DavidR
#13958
In most rendering tasks, Opteron 250 is roughly equivalent to Xeon 3.6. Xeons seem to be preferred for Maxwell because hyperthreading gives a boost, but if you're mostly using VRay, Brazil, or mental ray, eg, Opterons may be better, depending on what you render (high-res stills, anim with motion blur, etc). Note that dual-core from Intel will not have Hyperthreading, and that Opteron dual-cores will be pin-compatible with current up-to-date motherboards, needing only a BIOS update to work. Revision 'E' Opterons have SSE3, also, which helps in some apps, like Max.
User avatar
By tom
#18184
hrothgar wrote:EXACTLY. It would be great if someone could benchmark it. It only takes a few minutes.
maybe you have to review benchmarking legends like andron :)
By Matthew Schrock
#18369
hrothgar wrote:
And it looked like you had HT turned on in that screen capture.

hrothgar

I've noticed that Maxwell claims HT is enabled whether it actually is or not.


Matthew
User avatar
By hdesbois
#18390
Matthew Schrock wrote:
I've noticed that Maxwell claims HT is enabled whether it actually is or not.
Quite so, even on machines that are not HT capable (old PIV).

HD
User avatar
By tom
#20422
why 1.1.32?
By DavidR
#22745
kay wrote:Thank you :)

I find it a little depressing to see that the rendering time of a Pentium 4 2,6 Ghz is similiar to the rendering time of an Athlon64 3200+ (because i had planed to buy an Athlon64 3000+ System).
If you get an AMD, make sure it's the E stepping or higher; it has SSE3, so should work better with apps that take advantage of it, like Max. The E stpping is pretty new, so you might have to wait unless you can afford the latest and greatest AMD, which is really expensive right now.
By Yog
#23334
Hope you don't mind me throwing in my 2 pennys worth. These are some of the standard tests I do on any new renderer. They help me gauge settings when making materials.
First some roughness tests using the aluminium material
Image
Image
The next are glass samples. Top is a solid sphere, middle is a hollow sphere with the bottom cut off, last is a flat plane (with thickness).
Image
Image
Image
Image
I think I need to do more testing on the Absorbance setting, doesn't appear to have much effect, I get a more predictible result using colour to control absorbance (or effect of).
By DELETED
#23336
DELETED
By slobodan
#23412
Hi guys,


Do you still need Dual Athlon benchmark??

I have:
Dual Opteron 248
2GB OCZ Ram
Asus k8N-DL MOBO
ATI FireGL V7100
I think this is all that matters for benchmark. :lol:

Slobodan
User avatar
By tom
#23454
Thank you YOG!
By slobodan
#23598
Thank you YOG, very helpful.

By the way, has anybody seen maxwell reach 25 samples in their lifetime??? The most I have seen is 21 on my dual opteron after 24h and it's still unacceptably grainy.

Hello everybody, We have just released a new vers[…]

Help with swimming pool water

Nothing beats observing the real world or, if that[…]

Sketchup 2026 Released

Considering how long a version for Sketchup 2025 t[…]

Greetings, One of my users with Sketchup 2025 (25[…]