All posts relating to Maxwell Render 1.x
By ricardo
#118653
knurrebusk wrote:Please! :)

No more wonders!!

Just fix glass/sun/shadows from outside view etc!

I just can´t understand why so many on this forum do not see the importance of this issue.

It reminds me of old LW horrors with cheating all over the place to make shadows look soft/light.

Then Autodesk just cut the throat on Lightscape, and let it die slowly with it´s customers.

Just 1 single question in the end.

Is there hope of provideing just a simple image of a Maxwell RC6-R1+ render with sun/shadows through glass ?

"SEEN FROM THE OUTSIDE"
Well, to be honest, the sun/glass/shadow gang is of no use to me. Give me dispersion and I'm happy. I aways render inside. MXI emitters! A better rinoll plugin as a gift.

Ricardo
By knurrebusk
#118659
Ricardo wrote

"I aways render inside. MXI emitters! A better rinoll plugin as a gift."


Yes! I understand these needs.
I use Rhino myself, great tool for maritime construction.
But sooner or later theese need to interact with sky/sun/glass.

It´s fundamental, and sometime in the future you´ll ask for them too :)
User avatar
By Kabe
#118676
ricardo wrote:
Adam Trachtenberg wrote: Oo oo oo, maybe they're going to reenable motion blur!! ::groans::
& MXI emitters!
ho ho ho
Reenabling motion blur would be enabling it for Cinema... was supposed to be ready "in a few weeks" back in spring 2005 :D

Yes, and getting MXI again would be *very* nice indeed.

I would like to point out that these are render core topics though, not plugin
topics. and my point was that even quite silly plugin bugs are still in there that are not dependent at all at the state of the core and the SDK.

Kabe
User avatar
By Mihai
#118682
buffos, do you actually expect Mike to answer that? Even if he could, do you think he would?

You guys are asking many questions which can't be answered, then you get all upset because they haven't been answered :roll:
By giacob
#118685
maybe after months saying this is FIXED aNd that is FIXED ( i remember well the list in the beta section full of statemen that proved to be utterly false) NL willl come out again "sorry we have discovered we were on a dead alley with that engin and had to change the core from inside out"....
no kidding just a mightmare... or not?
User avatar
By jonathan löwe
#118729
in some way, it is very nice (and a little strange) to have all these cds labeled with RC1, RC2, RC3 on it....

in some years we are all going to laugh about this :D
User avatar
By Julian
#118730
jonathan löwe wrote:in some way, it is very nice (and a little strange) to have all these cds labeled with RC1, RC2, RC3 on it....

in some years we are all going to laugh about this :D
...maybe Victors bonus gift will be a rack to put them all on... RC73... RC74... :roll:
User avatar
By jonathan löwe
#118734
:D
User avatar
By aitraaz
#118793
Ok cool thanks...just curious...screenshot? have there been any substantial changes to the gui? Anyways thnx any info is always appreciated...
User avatar
By NicoR44
#118797
Maximus3D wrote:That's too kind of you Nico :) i appreciate the help. There's no rush tho,
whenever you have time and wanna do it.

/ Max
wrong topic :wink: but no problem Max :D
  • 1
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

So, Apple announced deprecation at the developer c[…]

render engines and Maxwell

I'm talking about arch-viz and architecture as tho[…]

> .\maxwell.exe -benchwell -nowait -priority:[…]