Lowest bm

Lowest bm#216334

By Thomas An. - Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:01 am

- Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:01 am #216334

Hi all,

We all talk about how to improve this and that in order to get higher benchmarks in Maxwell ... but ... out of curiosity, what is the lowest benchmark you have ever gotten on your fastest machine ?

Last edited by Thomas An. on Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

"Only the happy can escape the labyrinth, but only those who escape are happy"

#216335

By 4 HeRo - Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:03 am

- Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:03 am #216335

Amd 2800 1.5GBram 2.2Bm

#216337

By Thomas An. - Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:16 am

- Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:16 am #216337

4 HeRo wrote:Amd 2800 1.5GBram 2.2Bm

Cool

... How did you do that ?

"Only the happy can escape the labyrinth, but only those who escape are happy"

#216345

By b-kandor - Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:38 am

- Sat Mar 17, 2007 7:38 am #216345

I'm thoroughly confused by this question

#216362

By kizo - Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:46 pm

- Sat Mar 17, 2007 2:46 pm #216362

sometimes i get the BM 0.something and it keeps like that as long as i let it..
i haven't figured out why this heppens but when it does the computing is done by 1% of proc. power.
the same scene with exactly the same settings renders normally when started again an BM goes up to 70 cca.

#216587

By Tim Ellis - Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:29 pm

- Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:29 pm #216587

0.2 is my lowest. Not a good result. 4kx4k render.

Tim.

http://emp3d.com
-------------------------------------
Next Limit Certified Training Centre for Maxwell Render.
Maxwell Render Training & consultancy. A-Team tester.

#216629

By ivox3 - Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:08 pm

- Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:08 pm #216629

Thomas, ....this is a very unscientific inquiry --- I'm a little surprised.

Last edited by ivox3 on Wed Mar 21, 2007 3:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Fall WinterSpringSummer

#216902

By Hybaj - Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:55 am

- Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:55 am #216902

ivox3 wrote:Thomas, ....this is a very unscientific inquiry --- I'm a little surprised.

Exactly

Look into my blue jellyfish of love and let your spirit be adaptively displaced

#245369

By Tim Ellis - Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:09 pm

- Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:09 pm #245369

My new record:-

Benchmark of 0.009

8 core 4gb x64bit render node. 5000x2810 ml render.

3.5GB mxi.

Tim.

http://emp3d.com
-------------------------------------
Next Limit Certified Training Centre for Maxwell Render.
Maxwell Render Training & consultancy. A-Team tester.

#245370

By Thomas An. - Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:23 pm

- Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:23 pm #245370

Tim Ellis wrote:My new record:- Benchmark of 0.009

ouch

"Only the happy can escape the labyrinth, but only those who escape are happy"

#245384

By sandykoufax - Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:36 pm

- Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:36 pm #245384

Tim Ellis wrote:My new record:-

Benchmark of 0.009

8 core 4gb x64bit render node. 5000x2810 ml render.

3.5GB mxi.

Tim.

I want to know the result of it.

many limits team
:: twitter :: Gallery :: My 3D products :: ...and ::

#245388

By Tim Ellis - Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:51 pm

- Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:51 pm #245388

sandykoufax wrote:
Tim Ellis wrote:My new record:-

Benchmark of 0.009

8 core 4gb x64bit render node. 5000x2810 ml render.

3.5GB mxi.

Tim.
I want to know the result of it.

I sacked the render as it took toooooo long to even see a result other than a black screen, other nodes had 0.008 with the highest one at 0.01. pftt!

Result was due to 15 very high poly emitters, some with 7900 tris per object.

Have now changed these to single poly emitters shining through the high poly versions and will post resulting BM when rendered.

Tim.

http://emp3d.com
-------------------------------------
Next Limit Certified Training Centre for Maxwell Render.
Maxwell Render Training & consultancy. A-Team tester.

#245390

By Fernando Tella - Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:05 pm

- Mon Oct 01, 2007 7:05 pm #245390

Other thing that reduces BM a lot is crossing clipped planes. Some time ago I was trying to make a tree crossing around 300 clipped planes at the same point and the benchmark falled down to 1-2 in a 640x480 image.

http://www.ftella.com

#245545

By Leonardo - Tue Oct 02, 2007 3:14 pm

- Tue Oct 02, 2007 3:14 pm #245545

kizo wrote:sometimes i get the BM 0.something and it keeps like that as long as i let it..
i haven't figured out why this heppens but when it does the computing is done by 1% of proc. power.
the same scene with exactly the same settings renders normally when started again an BM goes up to 70 cca.

I get the same thing some times 0.0000000000000something

I imagine it happen when Maxwell consumes all the ram in voxelization

Next time I render at a lower resolution it works fine

EDIT- Hey, It just happen... I got a 0.02