Please post here anything else (not relating to Maxwell technical matters)
By sandykoufax
#157824
Image

Image

Image

Here is Hopo.

There is a subway station which is my favorite station.

and the last girl is my niece. She likes painting with painter. :)
User avatar
By ivox3
#157834
Max: nice shots! .....that's a nice cam you have. :) what kind?


Lars, Bugy, Vis and Sandy. :) the kids ! , ....love these shots. So nice.
User avatar
By Maximus3D
#157840
ludenhud: Thanks :) some views from home never hurt heh..

ivox: Thanks :D it's not too bad for the relatively low price (approx 300 euro). However it's just a regular pocketcamera with a few extra functions like those you find in bigger and more costly cameras. It's this one i got - http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/olympus/sp350-review/ it'll do a pretty good job until that day i can afford a real good digital SLR with lenses and all that good stuff :)

Btw, great & cute pics of all the lil kids

Cheers & thanx again!

/ Max
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#157883
LarsSon, your images have some extra richness to them (very sharp and vivid) ... what camera did you use on those ?
User avatar
By Mihai
#157891
He mentioned it's the Canon 350D, but I'm wondering what lens he used for those morning misty shots....perhaps also something special about the light in Finland :) When there is some.....
By JDHill
#157900
Mihai wrote:...the light in Finland :) When there is some.....
:lol: :lol: :lol:

...you guys rock...keep on posting! ...I'd show some of my Sony Cybershot stuff -> it's got 3.2 MEGAPIXELS!!! :lol:

~JD
User avatar
By aitraaz
#157901
@max: great work with that camera!! :shock:

@sandy: brilliant niece!! :)
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#157909
Mihai wrote:He mentioned it's the Canon 350D....
woo, that's high end ... 8.0 Mp with 22x15mm CCD and the original lens has an f1.0.
User avatar
By Mihai
#157915
f1.0? That can't be right, the lens that comes with it is pretty bad. It goes from 3.5 to 5.6 depending on zoom but it's so light it feels like it's all made of plastic. I'm wondering if LarSon used any L series lens for those pics, one that goes down to 1.2 costs more than the camera :P
User avatar
By Thomas An.
#157919
Mihai wrote:f1.0? That can't be right,
ops, you are right. It is indeed a 3.5-5.6 (I didn't read the specs too well :oops: )
The 350D is the one you have too ? right ?
User avatar
By LarsSon
#157920
Those children photos are taken in Bratislava (it's not in Finland) Slovakia.
I used Sigma 70-300mm lens. It's not expensive one, but i like it.
I don't have money for L series. :cry:

...and what do you mean "when there is light in Finland"? It's allmost
9 pm now, and the sun is still shining quite nicely. After a month it
won't go down at all. :D

-LarsSon
User avatar
By Mihai
#157927
Thomas An. wrote: The 350D is the one you have too ? right ?
Yes, it's a great camera and very similar specs to the 20D which is twice as much. But you can forget about using the supplied lens, unless it's for setting up render tests :)
User avatar
By blueplanetdesign
#157928
Elaborate on the issue with the supplied lens...poor quality?
By DELETED
#157932
DELETED
  • 1
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 202

I don't think that in 2 years AI will be precise l[…]

Help with swimming pool water

Hi Andreas " I would say the above "fake[…]