- Tue Jul 05, 2005 12:03 am
#42887
So, if you are modeling a book on a desk then most likely a 50W or 80W would do.
Also, don't forget that all these (emitters, shutterspeed, fstop, ISO) are merely many ways of controlling intensity. In reality a photographer cannot alsways change the lightbulbs so he just controls the camera speed and apperture (which has the same affect as using a stronger light)
The maxwell emitters behave as incadescent lights of similar wattage. As long as you model in real life dimensions, then the emitter intensity should be about the same you would use in reality to illuminate the object.enodren wrote:.... What is the correlation between Rhino units of measure and the intensity and unit values under emitters?
So, if you are modeling a book on a desk then most likely a 50W or 80W would do.
Also, don't forget that all these (emitters, shutterspeed, fstop, ISO) are merely many ways of controlling intensity. In reality a photographer cannot alsways change the lightbulbs so he just controls the camera speed and apperture (which has the same affect as using a stronger light)
http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1441Secondly, what are some rules of thumb regarding ozone, turbidity and water in physical sky set ups? I
I will add this in the wish listFinally, I propose that the longitude/latitude values are switched to latitude/longitude with N/S and E/W rather than positive and negative values... a small detail, but I have found the values listed in this convention at almost every site that I've visited and it's kind of a pain to remember to switch them around every time.
"Only the happy can escape the labyrinth, but only those who escape are happy"


- By Edward Leibnitz