By JDHill
#346667
Yes, it has always been like this. Basically, the way to understand it is: if you use some script or plugin to define how objects move over time, then the Maxwell plugin will provide you with a way of rendering those movements with motion blur. The Maxwell plugin itself, however, does not intend to play the part of that animation script or plugin.
By Polyxo
#346671
Hi JD,
while I talked about this already a few time I think any way to make MoBlur storable inside a file and let it be by saving a dumb frozen Mesh-Snapshop would be more useful
than what we currently have.

Holger
By JDHill
#346672
We'll see, Holger...I have long had vague plans for re-doing the whole mblur part of the plugin, but they depend heavily on V5's final implementation.
By Polyxo
#346674
JDHill wrote:We'll see, Holger...I have long had vague plans for re-doing the whole mblur part of the plugin, but they depend heavily on V5's final implementation.
Cool.
By kami
#346720
that'd be great! I'm looking so much forward to rhino releasing the v5 as a stable release. It already is so much better than v4 that I can't go back now ...
motionblur is not a very often used feature (at least not for me), and I guess I can't be at the moment :)
I'm now using points to store the two movement positions. Luckily I've never had any complex movements besides a simple move command!

cheers,
kami
Help with swimming pool water

Hi Andreas " I would say the above "fake[…]

render engines and Maxwell

Other rendering engines are evolving day by day, m[…]