By JDHill
#348686
Maxwell for Cinema 4D
Version 2.6.0.0 Release Notes

This version introduces support for Maxwell Render's new Hair and MXS Referencing systems, as well as multi-substep motion blur.

Changes:
  • Compiled for compatibility with Maxwell Render 2.6.
  • Added support for multi-substep motion blur.
  • Added support for exporting motion-blurred instances.
  • Added support for instancing of MXS References.
  • Added support for motion blur on MXS References.
  • Removed restrictions on instances with emitter materials.
  • Parallel cameras are now exported using long-lens approximations.
  • Simplified the Scene Name output format dropdown.
  • Added 'Open output folder' button for convenience.
  • Split 'Options' group into 'Export Options' and 'Motion Blur & Animation'.
  • Added support for Separate/Comosite render channel output.
  • Added support for the Normals and Position render channels.
  • Added support for specifying formats for the various render channels.
  • Changed Multilight checkbox to Intensity/Color/Disabled drop-down.
  • Added Quality parameter for rendering with Production/Draft engines.
  • Added Composite/Separate/Disabled MXI Output parameter.
  • Added new Sky Intensity and IBL Intensity Multiplier parameters.
  • IBL UI re-worked to support new per-channel illumination choices.
  • Output groups reorganized to more closely match Maxwell Studio.
  • Added support for the export of multiple UV channels per object.
  • Enhanced support for rendering via Cinema 4D's command line.
By JDHill
#348816
No, not yet. May I ask for your opinion on how you would envision these (they are two separate things) working inside of Cinema?
User avatar
By Aniki
#348935
Ah, ok so I can stop looking for it ;)

thanks, JD.

Well, as I understood it, loading Particle bins via the RealFlow Particle Importer converts these into thinking particles internally anyways, right ?

else maybe teaming up with Peter Horvath on this issue makes more sense ?

cheers

Aniki
By JDHill
#349953
Question: why use a referenced MXM, if you want to copy it locally with the MXS? It seems to me like that would defeat the purpose.

So, is this a known issue?