[caryjames]

Nice render................... real flow?

Looks good- no problems with display and we don't have to be redirected to view

[-Adrian]

I've mentioned tinypic on several occasions. Imageshack users are probably very habitual people

[ivox3]

Hey, all you can see this image?

If it's ok, I'll use only this.

Can you see this Sandy ? Everyone else can, ... right ?

[Leonardo]

can you see my image??




if you can, tiny pic is the one for me

[yanada]

http://www.pict.com/

[-Adrian]

can you see my image??

if you can tiny pic is the one for me

Nice sea birds!

And yes, tinypic is good stuff. Has been around over a year i think, so your uploads are probably safe.

[sandykoufax]

Hey, all you can see this image?

If it's ok, I'll use only this.

Can you see this Sandy ? Everyone else can, ... right ?

I can't see anything. Chris, did you post something image??




Tinypic give a thumbnail service?
It's the only reason why I use imageshack and xs.to.

[ivox3]

White pixels. Lots of 'em.

[Hervé]

can you see my image??




if you can, tiny pic is the one for me

wowow... very dirty nails.... errkkkkk...

[deflix]

[Hervé]

I guess that's your fiancée.. she looks gorgeous...

[w i l l]

This could start a trend.

[w i l l]

Anyway back on topic, I used to use Flickr but now I think they've put some image restriction size for viewing.

[polynurb]

hmm... everyone always complains about imageshack... i use direct linking to .jpgs of not more than 1280 pix with.. i have about 25 images in the gallery, and they all load within a second when i vistit the page. so i am still pretty happy with it...

[sandykoufax]

25 image? Oh man, I have 395 images on my imageshack account.
But they lost some of my images and sometimes the loading is too slow on my PC.


ps) Allison Stokke is gorgeous!