[mgroeteke]

RENDER TIMES

48m 16s 15.46 samples

dual xeon 3.6 w/ HT
6 GB ram
win x64

..thanx for testing with your Beast PC!

cy,
Andronikos

how about the G5 results? do i understand correctly that the rendertimes in the logs have to be halved for two processors?

markus

[Robert Cervellione]

i am a little pist off at the results because i was deciding wether to get the dual xeons or dual amd 250's, i think i sould of spent the extra cash for the 250's

[lobegnome]

WEEE .. Just got Maxwell and wanna share with you all my Benchmark results on my Pentium D (dual-core) 830 3.0 GHz with 2 GB ram and WinXP.

== Render settings ==

resolution: 640 x 480
maximum desired time: 16h 39m 0s
threads: 4
target sampling level: 15.00

>> Starting Render

> Re-rendering: this render can be resumed...>> Start Voxelization...
>> End Voxelization...

/
[0h 0m 5s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 0.00 -
[0h 0m 18s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 0.58 /
[0h 0m 40s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 2.67 -
[0h 1m 16s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 4.55 |
[0h 2m 23s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 6.34 /
[0h 4m 25s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 8.09 |
[0h 8m 26s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 9.82 \
[0h 15m 14s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 11.54 |
[0h 24m 34s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 12.70 /
[0h 33m 58s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 13.48 |
[0h 43m 22s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 14.07 |
[0h 51m 25s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 14.55 -
[1h 0m 46s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 14.95 \
[1h 10m 16s] of [16h 39m 0s] , current sampling level : 15.29

Render finished successfully


Close this window to End Session...


MAXWELL 1_2_2a_beta ( Engine core: rs1c )
[ Physically and Unbiased Based Rendering ]


## Scene Information ##

44 meshes ( 37798 triangles )

## Render Information ##

*settings:

resolution: 640 x 480

*render time: 1 hours 10 minutes 18 seconds

target sampling level: 15
sampling level reached: 15

MaxwellBench 1.0: 35.866328


Cheers!!

[arch4d]

i saw some xeon results in this thread, but i can´t find them in the graphs on page 1,
so can anybody tell me if a dual opteron 248 renders faster than a dual xeon 3,2 ?

want to buy one, and don´t know which one...

[thomas lacroix]

look at page 4, xeon 3.2 render in 43mn 27sec
and the biopteron 248 in 38mn 4Osec

could sound little but do the math in hours of render and make your choice,

[arch4d]

thanks a lot ! i´ll check it out...

[andronikos916]

...Imagine waht this beast will render maxwell like!

...my future dream PC! (one day)

http://www.tyan.com/products/html/m4881.html

Tyan Thunder K8QW (S4881) and M4881 - Processor Expansion Board (for S4881)

8 x Dual Core Opterons 875 = 16 Cores!
64mb DDR
...etc.

I know that boxx at Sigraph demonrtated Lightwave Rendering with 8 cores I will do it for Maxwell with 16 cores!

I want that for Maxwell!

hehe!

Andronikos

[thomas lacroix]

only 1518 with 8 dualcore in cinebench? while the dual core biopteron 275 is around 1200...?
sounds odd...

[andronikos916]

only 1518 with 8 dualcore in cinebench? while the dual core biopteron 275 is around 1200...?
sounds odd...

I agree the 1500 score is not that much. My Dual Xeon OC@3.2 scores around 700. So I expected to see a 3000+ score. Maybe that scene is not heavy any more... don't know.

Also c4d is Intel optimized and loves HT.

Since Maxwell seems to like both the same you will see a huge difference with that System.

cy,
Andronikos

[thomas lacroix]

my little P4 tops around 256
sure i'd like some of those beast to work with maxwell, currently it seems that for producion i'll have to wait at least 20 to 40 hours for demanding render....

[rendertaxi]

hi all,

i´d like to benchmark my system but i´m not shure if there is any comparison possible now, as most of these benches were made with version 1.1.33 and now its 1_2_2_beta..
can i just take the old scene and render?

thanks for your answers.

alex

[andronikos916]

only 1518 with 8 dualcore in cinebench? while the dual core biopteron 275 is around 1200...?
sounds odd...

by the way these are 4 Dual Cores = 8 cpus.

cy,
Andronikos

[thomas lacroix]

ok so at least we could had expected 2200CB at least with 8cpus versus 4...

[Mihai]

Now witness the power of this FULLY OPERATIONAL BATTLE STATION!!!

With 1.22a so I don't know how these scores relate to 1.33:

48m 36s sl 15.28

X2 3800 oc to 2.4 (equivalent to 4800)
Win2K SP4
2 gigs ram

Not bad, it's seems equal to a 3.6GHZ dual Xeon machine. I think i'll overclock it a bit more

I think Robert used 1.22a as well? Otherwise it's strange that a dual 3.2 Xeon system is 10 minutes faster than a 3.6 system.

I guess it has to do with the bounce control in the previous betas....

[DELETED]

DELETED