- Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:34 pm
#392023
Mac users can always rely on CPU rendering and buy a powerful workstation for that. Oh wait...
that is correct. the full scene needs to fit on each card, so you don't get the benefit of combining vram. For GPU rendering, I only am versed in Octane render and I know they have a feature where you can offload textures to your system ram, which can be really useful. i don't know if maxwell planned on adding this or not.ptaszek wrote:walterfog wrote:two question:
does the maxwell GPU for a single scene use all the vram of all the card present in the computer? if I have 2 card, each with 12 gb vram, does maxwell could use 24 gb vram for a single scene?
second: does make sense for a OSX user to upgrade a maxwell 4? i don't think cause OSX users could not have GPU renderer.... that's incredibile!!!
I am quite sure it will still use 12GB no matter how many of them u have in your system.
In that case, Cuda only considers 12Gb total.walterfog wrote: does the maxwell GPU for a single scene use all the vram of all the card present in the computer? if I have 2 card, each with 12 gb vram, does maxwell could use 24 gb vram for a single scene?
If Maxwell's GPU is like other companies, you will need to keep on gpu dedicated to run your monitors while have the other two gpus for rendering only.def4d wrote:walterfog wrote:
I hope rendering with Gpus will let us be able to use the computer, some renderers don't and that's hell.
I've noticed that "export all" creates l[…]
hmmm can you elaborate a bit about the the use of […]