JDHill wrote:
- What does resolution=5 mean?
Here I rather had expected some pixel values
I actually wasn't aware (or couldn't remember) that raising quality equals
higher res (there were a lot of other factors thinkable which could impact quality).
Resolution is in so far great as it's immediately understandable, not of so many abstract parameter as Benchmark
or Sampling level.
JDHill wrote:[*]Since the rendered resolution gets stretched to fit the fire window or Rhino viewport, it's not actually the resolution you see.[/list]
That makes sense, unfortunately.
That said: Every Photoshop user will still extract more information from knowing that that he's actually looking at a 320px/160px image, (just stretched to size of a hand)
than just from an abstact number. No big issue at all though.