Well, gee Ha Loe, thanks for clearing all that up. You're right, I may be a little naive, after all I only starting using computers when I wire wrapped my first one in around 1978 based on a MITS Altair design. It had 1K of memory and programmed in binary with banks of switches. Programs were written on an old fashioned yellow pad in machine code and transferred by hand. Running a program meant flipping the switch between RUN/STOP. After that I've built every single computer I've had. Maybe it's that new-fangled BIOS that's got me all turned around...
And I admit, I'm the
only one in the entire world that's a "bit anti MS"; everyone else thinks they're just swell.
I'm going to skip right over your explanation of booting; if I didn't know anything about this stuff I'd think you correct. I do know something about it so I'll skip over all the holes in the explanation.
Whether you agree or not, I stand by my assertion
that doing anything, at all, whatsoever, to the installed OS's on the other drives, especially in light of the fact that this is a trial beta version is
absolutely ludicrous. Then to interrupt the boot process to display a cute little screen asking if I really want to boot to a "previous OS" is just a smack in the face. In my case it was on another drive that I can format and forget it. I feel sorry for anyone that decides to "try it out" and finds they're now "stuck" with a trial beta that won't uninstall, messed with normal boot and their apps.
Your last statement is the most accurate; boot.ini
was the way things were handled in XP, etc. With the advent of Vista things changed "just a little". But you knew that. If you in fact keep track of these things (per my previous post with link) you'll see that good 'ole MS is making every effort to tie the OS to the hardware (and will point the finger at the hardware vendor and say "
It was them made me do it" when the brown stuff hits the spinning bladed object), in which case that little box sitting under your desk is under someone else's control, like it or not.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not "Eureka!" but "That's funny ..."
Isaac Asimov