Does the current plugin support C4D R11?
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:59 pm
As the header says. Can I use the current C4D plugin with C4D R11 OS X?
TIA
Adri
TIA
Adri
Maxwell Render | Official public forum
The official Maxwell Render public forum. A place to share your latest projects and be inspired by others, or get help and feedback from the Maxwell community
https://forum.maxwellrender.com/
Does the current plugin support C4D R11?
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 11:02 pm
As far as I know, yes; I mean, it seems to work fine here on my Intel Mac.
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:14 am
Thanks,
As a follow up. I'm using C4D in 64 bit mode. Will the plugin work in the 64 bit version of C4D and more to the point is MXCL etc now 64 bit on OS X?
TIA
Adri
As a follow up. I'm using C4D in 64 bit mode. Will the plugin work in the 64 bit version of C4D and more to the point is MXCL etc now 64 bit on OS X?
TIA
Adri
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:59 pm
Ok, no then, the plugin will not load if you run in 64bit mode. There is a 64bit tech preview of MXCL available, but I have not used it yet myself.
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:44 pm
Hi
Is there a plan to have a plugin for R11 on OS X that will support running in 64 bits? It would be better if MXCL can also run in 64 bits but as a start if I can use the plugin in my 64 bit C4D and then render out to the 32 bit MXCL that would be good.
Cheers
Adri
Is there a plan to have a plugin for R11 on OS X that will support running in 64 bits? It would be better if MXCL can also run in 64 bits but as a start if I can use the plugin in my 64 bit C4D and then render out to the 32 bit MXCL that would be good.
Cheers
Adri
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:59 pm
Hi Adri,
There is a version of MXCL which can run on 64bits, but the plugin will not do so right away. A good instancing implementation has a much bigger payoff, memory-wise, than getting 64bits working on OSX. After that, yes this will be one of the first priorities for the plugin.
Cheers...
There is a version of MXCL which can run on 64bits, but the plugin will not do so right away. A good instancing implementation has a much bigger payoff, memory-wise, than getting 64bits working on OSX. After that, yes this will be one of the first priorities for the plugin.
Cheers...
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:25 pm
So what's the current status on this subject?JDHill wrote:A good instancing implementation has a much bigger payoff, memory-wise
How much instancing is implemented up to now?
How much will be in the next version?
BTW i love the new plugin version, had mw shelfed for quite a while because of the awkward look&feel(&use&workarounds), now the spark is back
thanks!
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:47 pm
I won't say exactly what I'm doing, but things are looking much better than I had previously expected on the instancing front, imho. When it's done, I hope you'll agree. 
Cheers...
Cheers...