Maxwell Render | Official public forum

would be nice, to have hdri back...

i thought it works!?

cheers
stefan

It does but not from the plug-in. You need to reselect the HDRI in Studio

Matt

god damnit Beta was better than this

AndreD wrote:would be nice, to have hdri back...

Thanks for the note AndreD it is already on the list as G01 here:

http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/view ... 964#166964

And let me guess, they´re going for user suggestions 01 and 02, because this will hopefully force even more people to use Maxwell Studio...?

Rochr wrote:And let me guess, they´re going for user suggestions 01 and 02, because this will hopefully force even more people to use Maxwell Studio...?

Rochr,

Its time to lighten up, after a year of this (disgruntled remarks), is not it about time? To realize that Next Limit is not just sitting around doing nothing about Maxwell Render or the plug-ins. They understand your issues and are working very diligently to get us all there with an application that is solid and expressive.

They happen to take a good look at our suggestions and just like any other software developer, if it can be implemented and falls within their greater scope of where they would like the software to go then it will become a part of the software. Just be open minded that it may not be implemented in exactly the way you wish but there is great possibility the essence of the functionality will be there.

Hi Tyrone,

No offense, but if I'm not mistaken you yourself have said in the past that the plugin will be no more than an exporter. Without any clear message from NL and the actions of the plast year+ what is one to believe?

All these threads are still about communication. What is going to happen? ALL bugs fixed and ALL features implemented???? That's a lofty goal considering that NL hasn't ever really been clear about what the features are (at least what features will be implemented in the plug). I'm referring to the message from Nicole here.

Personally, I hear NL asking for everyone to be patient and have faith, which is fine, but faith about what?

seco7 wrote:Hi Tyrone,

No offense, but if I'm not mistaken you yourself have said in the past that the plugin will be no more than an exporter. Without any clear message from NL and the actions of the plast year+ what is one to believe?

All these threads are still about communication. What is going to happen? ALL bugs fixed and ALL features implemented???? That's a lofty goal considering that NL hasn't ever really been clear about what the features are (at least what features will be implemented in the plug). I'm referring to the message from Nicole here.

Personally, I hear NL asking for everyone to be patient and have faith, which is fine, but faith about what?

Hello Seco,

I said at the time, that was what I was using it mainly for, was with the understanding that of course the plug-in was being worked as mentioned in this forum a few times. I am in no way the director of the development of the plug-in.

There has been clear communication, there has been comments from the developer, more than one newsletter has said the plug-ins are under heavy development. They cannot always be right here in the forums to answer your every question, but they have made the effort to give enough information to indicate that work is moving forward on all fronts that concern Maxwell Render.

Trust that great strides have been made with Cinemaxwell and more will come. It will be worth the wait. Development takes time, not all features will be 100%; that goes for every program. Some things will be there (100%) others will require more time to develop fully (less than 100%).

Tyrone Marshall wrote:There has been clear communication,

Well, I guess we just disagree about this point.

Tyrone Marshall wrote:Development takes time, not all features will be 100%; that goes for every program. Some things will be there (100%) others will require more time to develop fully (less than 100%).

But regardless of what Nicole or the newsletter says, we seem to agree about development.