[noseman]

as you can all see, the only person that has replied to this thread is tyrone. even though I disagree 100% with his NL supportive comments, I still admire him for his courage to stand by this mess-of-a-sw-package.

I hope(ed) that his (tyrones) wishes of the past would come true, and NL would deliver a 100% working plugin for their PREPAID customers. But, as usual, NL has delivered a bunch of crap.
I understand that many (maybe most) users have been working with the available workarounds and have been producing excellent work.
That is not an excuse to NL's thievery. These people ARE crooks, and that is how we should confront them.
If you don't like me talking like this, don't bann me. Just give me my money back... but OTOH you are so lame, you preferre to listen to this, than to do what's right.

YOU ARE A LAME BUNCH, NL.... SHAME ON YOU.
YOU GOT MY MONEY... COOL. I SPIT ON YOU...... CHEAP bastards.

P.S. please Tyrone, don't even think of supporting them against any of my arguments (sorry for me beeing rude, but I don't wan't to get personal with you). this has gotten too personal between me and NL's lame bunch...

[Kabe]

Sorry Noseman, but this will lead you nowhere. It's obvious that the current
plugin is very limited, and I agree that it's even worse than before in a
couple of workflow issues. I also agree that the speed of plugin development
or it's quality is not satisfactory.

HOWEVER: I'm confident NL is trying to fix it, and they won't do any faster
if you or anyone else spits on them. There are generally speaking 3 options
for them:
- Releasing the Mac SDK and hoping someone else get's this right
- Open their code for review to others or even open source it
- Doing it on their own

All of your comment only supports option #4: Spit on you and leave it as it is.

Kabe

[noseman]

You are 100% correct, Kabe.
The thing is, I don't care any more...
Thanks for your concern, anyway.

[arch4d]

i must have missed the part of the purchase agreement that stated NL had any obligations to provide any plugins for any package let alone all the 3d apps in the world.
foolishly, i thought the stated goal was that they were going to make a 3d standalone renderer called maxwell.

besides, seeing how there are no other ways to render in maxwell other than through a plugin, my eyes are open now to see that it is much better that every 3d app in the world work with maxwell before we get really useless things like dislpacement and camera motion blur.

first of all, calm down a bit guys !!!
i fell foolished, too, but actually i am able to use maxwell...
...and damn, this program IS GOOD !!!

but, sidenimjay, i have to state that when i purchased maxwell at early beta stage NL wrote on it´s website that they would provide a fully functional and flawlessly integrated plugin (not only for cinema, but also for programs that aren´t in the plugin list anymore).

i simply don´t understand why good features like the camera selection were erased from the new plugin, and things like camera animation, motion blur, animation output, groups still aren´t implemented in this plugin, while max or lightwave users already use these features.

without complaining, i would also like to know the roadmap for this plugin...

cheers

[lllab]

i second arch4ds post

cheers
stefan

[aitraaz]

Holy crap

No spitting folks...

Lol i'll bet noseman's pissed after spain whupped on greece's arse in the basket finals. They should have given Sofoklis Schortsanitis more time on the court, he's a bad ass

[JDHill]

No spitting folks...

...I fart in your general direction.

[noseman]

I should have probably sent him to get my plugin upgrade (Schortsanitis).
Why didn't I think of it sooner?

[juan]

Hi all,

We know the current limitations of the plugin and the team is working to fix it asap. (In fact this months we are mainly focused in improving all the plugins, you will see that in next updates). Our C4 testers are giving us very good feedback and we are pretty confident we will get success soon.

Kind regards,

Juan

[lllab]

good to hear Juan,

thanks
cheers
Stefan

[seco7]

Thank you responding to this thread Juan.

[zoetropeuk]

Hi all,

We know the current limitations of the plugin and the team is working to fix it asap. (In fact this months we are mainly focused in improving all the plugins, you will see that in next updates). Our C4 testers are giving us very good feedback and we are pretty confident we will get success soon.

Kind regards,

Juan

Can you guys at least test it this time before releasing it. Simple things like the Sky Map tag simply do not work and if it was tested then this would have been picked up.

Matt

[lllab]

skymap doesnt not work???

stefan

p.s. there are testers for the plugins...

[greg3000]

I am talking about the C4D plugin.
You are out of excuses NL.
Sorry Tyrone but the "patience" attitude doesn't help me any more.

WE WANT OUR WOKING PLUGIN
WE WANT OUR WOKING PLUGIN
WE WANT OUR WOKING PLUGIN
WE WANT OUR WOKING PLUGIN
WE WANT OUR WOKING PLUGIN
WE WANT OUR WOKING PLUGIN
WE WANT OUR WOKING PLUGIN

Have you ever written software before? Development takes time. It will be ready when its ready. The same for a lot of software developers.

this software sucks, abandon maxwell.. there are other solutions

[v.montel]

Arguments???