Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 9:54 pm
Dan, I remember this coming up before, I am searching the forum to find an answer. Hopefully someone here that has more experience can give you the answer.
The official Maxwell Render public forum. A place to share your latest projects and be inspired by others, or get help and feedback from the Maxwell community
https://forum.maxwellrender.com/
As far as I know you can't. Seems to be disabled. Each node puts its current image in whatever location you specify in the render options (don't make this a network drive or each node is constantly overwriting the last one). So you can see a current preview of each particular node by opening that file, but you can't preview the merged file. I'm not sure if this is something that can be changed in future versions. It takes a long time to send all those MXIs across the network and merge them (at least 15 minutes on my network, sometimes an hour), so I assume it would be impractical to do that in real time during the render.dann_stubbs wrote:tyrone - how do i see the SL level when using the network rendering?
The way it currently works is that if you do a network rendering and specify SL 15, all machines will render to SL 15 and then combine to form a higher sampling level.dann_stubbs wrote:i did find another thread here and others have the same question as to seeing the SL level - and how to figure out the SL level - i.e. do all network render computers render to the set SL level THEN combine to get a higher SL?
or do they all go to a lower SL when then combined makes the SL level that is entered.
That's only true for the in progress image that each node saves out every couple minutes. MXIs are not saved until you stop the job, and the individual node MXIs are always saved on the local node in the Maxwell directory.dann_stubbs wrote:lllab wrote: i do have another concern - i read a post somewhere on this forum that said NOT to use a network drive for the files as each client will overwrite the last?
Dann,dann_stubbs wrote:i do have another concern - i read a post somewhere on this forum that said NOT to use a network drive for the files as each client will overwrite the last?
so anybody know if that is true or not? that is crazy if so - the instructions on setting up maxwell are fine - but from there it is just guessing... that is why i am not sure if i am seeing a combined image or am i just seeing the result of whatever last single computer wrote the file...
The combined MXI will be in the folder you specified unless there is a problem when the computer merges all the MXI files together. You will know there was a problem because the job won't say "success" it will probably still say "rendering".dann_stubbs wrote: so then where is the final combined image? technically is there one?
Sometimes you do, I've had instances where the final image file created from the MXI's was messed up. I'd say that until cooperative rendering is working flawlessly you’re probably going to have to do this.dann_stubbs wrote: or do i then have to open that final saved mxi file use that to generate one? (is that also a file i can use to resume the rendering?)
To stop a job you highlight the main branch of the job and press stop, depending on the speed of the computers it could take several seconds before you see a response. If the job doesn’t stop that means that one of the slave machines had an error, sometime restarting the service on the machine will fix it but most of the time it's an unrecoverable error and you won't be able to finish automatically merging the MXI's together. You will in this case have to merge them together manually which could require a lot of time depending on how many machines you are using.dann_stubbs wrote: so to stop a job (new question) do you press stop job on the top line or on each render client one at a time? one time i clicked the top and then wasn't sure since it didnt' respond right away (i think it would have if i waited longer) so i clicked a couple of the render clients themesleves and they did also say stopping - but the result image was corrupted looking (all jumbled image) so i'm not sure if that messed with the "right" way to stop the job.