Hey Casey, I´ve done ALOT of testing today, with various configurations.
This is what my conclusion is:
Manual merging (doing the painstaking thing to manually copy each cooperative.mxi file from each node to one place, and then in mxcl viewer choose cooperative mxi) always looks better than the .mxi file it creates automatically once rendering is done.
This is not the best comparision image.
This is the same image though, at 100% with a automerged image and manually merged image with as difference layer. I´ve adjusted the levels so you can see the difference better.. What you see is basically the noise difference between the two..
Btw.. Since the nodes seems to get stuck on the first .mxs scene file.. I had to create a .bat file removing the cooperative.mxs file so they would accept new incoming .mxs scene files.. So if you have the problem that you cooperative renders doesn't look any different from a single render, this might be the problem.
This is what I do..
1. I render a scene, once its done, I shut down the mxcl on the rendernodes.
2. I run a .bat file containing this:
del "C:\Program Files\Next Limit\Maxwell\cooperative*.*"
del "C:\Program Files\Next Limit\Maxwell\merge*.*"
3. I start mxcl -server again
4. I'll start a new network render.
This atleast works for me as a workaround for the moment..
/Regards Peter K
.: 18 x Quadcore 6600 * 4gb RAM :.
.: Moven Motion Capture :.
.: Red Cam One :.