Page 1 of 4

...

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:56 pm
by lsega77
...

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:36 pm
by simmsimaging
Well done. I'm not sure the composition is 100% but it's damn close (subjective call anyway).
Nice render for sure.

b

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 9:33 pm
by lsega77
...

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 9:37 pm
by NicoR44
Great render! also it looks like a mother and a child standing over their fallen father? with some spectators in the back ?

great lamps btw :wink:

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 9:45 pm
by lsega77
...

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 10:19 pm
by ivox3
NicoR44 wrote:Great render! also it looks like a mother and a child standing over their fallen father? with some spectators in the back ?

great lamps btw :wink:
How depressing ! ....lol. (edit: ..but I suppose poetic. ;)

___________

Nice Luis.... ;)

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 2:24 am
by lsega77
...

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 3:14 pm
by lsega77
...

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 4:54 pm
by simmsimaging
Very nice work, very realistic.

Have you looked at it with the contrast a bit higher? Might bring out the object's depth a bit more.

b

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:18 pm
by lsega77
...

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:21 pm
by ivox3
I think it's better. Looks like an archival shot to me. ;)

Only one thing, ...... what's going on with the white part on the pipe ?

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:45 pm
by lsega77
...

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 7:37 pm
by ivox3
It looks like noise, .... maybe just a simple 2 layer material would suffice .. :)

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 9:10 pm
by simmsimaging
Hi Luis -
I think this looks much better - the forms are much more evident and the tones have more snap. I understand your concern about contrast and realism but I don't think you have to worry - your eye looks pretty good to me so I think you can trust it.

Besides: you can have realistic shots that have nice snap and realistic shots that don't. I think it's more a question of matching good realistic shots, or not so good realistic shots. I just think your newer one just looks like a better photo than the first one did :)

b

Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 11:47 pm
by mverta
I'm going in the camp of: you just killed all the low-midtones and your first render is much better. The contrast one looks post-ed.

_MIke