[hdesbois]

Tantalum silicide(parallel to c-axis).ior TASI2-B.ior
S.L. 20
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: lower S.L. ok

[hdesbois]

Tantalum silicide(perpendicular to c axis).ior TASI2-A.ior

S.L. 20
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: lower level ok

[lebbeus]

Tantalum.ior TA.ior


S.L.: 17.00
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: Lower S.L. possible

[Tyrone Marshall]

Test.ior

S.L. 20
Render Costing: LOW
Remarks: Lower S.L. possible (<20)

[Jan]

Thorium Fluoride.ior THF4.ior



S.L.: 20
Render Cost: HIGH
Remarks: More SL required

[hdesbois]

Titanium nitride.ior TINI.ior

S.L.: 20
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: lower S.L. ok

[hdesbois]

Titanium oxide 1.ior TIO2.ior

S.L.: 20
Render Cost: HIGH
Remarks: weird

[smota]

Hi, smota, I repost your image on imgeshack for more convenience:







Silicon Germanium alloy on Germanium.ior sige_ge.ior

The high rendertime is a bit surprising. Are you sure you don't have a background process eating you CPU power?
HD

I had re-render it on three PCs, the best result:





Silicon Germanium alloy on Germanium (SiGe_Ge)

S.L.: 20
Render Costs: MEDIUM
Remarks: 17h on a Pentium IV

[Tyrone Marshall]

Titanium Oxide 2 (TiO2)
S.L. 20
Render Costing: LOW
Remarks: S.L. < 20 possible

[Jan]

Titanium silicide.ior TISI-A.ior



S.L.: 20
Render Cost: HIGH
Remarks: n/a

[hdesbois]

TI.ior

S.L.: 20
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: lower S.L. ok

[hdesbois]

Tungsten silicide(parallel to c-axis).ior WSI2-B.ior

S.L.: 19
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: lower S.L. ok

[jdp]

Tungsten silicide(perpendicular to c axis).ior WSI2-A.ior

S.L.: 18,7
Render Costing: MEDIUM
Remarks: intel mobile p4 3.06GHz, 512MB ram.

[Dexel]

Vanadium silicide (parallel to c-axis).ior VSI2-B.ior

S.L.: 20
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: S.L. < 20 sufficient

[Dexel]

Vanadium silicide (perpendicular to c-axis).ior VSI2-A.ior

S.L.: 20
Render Cost: LOW
Remarks: S.L. < 20 ok