Page 1 of 2
Our YEMA Watch reshoot to compare it with Fry
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 12:45 pm
by tanguy
Hi all that is our Wema Watch reshoot with 1.1 and compare with Fry.
Maxwell is really faster ....
FRY RENDERS
MAXWELL RENDERS
C&C are welcome
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:11 pm
by -Adrian
Very nice, i would like to see a larger render
Maxwell is sexah, always said that.
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 1:15 pm
by Hervé
the Maxwell renders are mucho nicer.. and like you said.... the render time...
Nice watch..
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:03 pm
by macray
the last one looks really nice!
And the maxwell renders seems to be clearer in that scene. Have you tried it on other scenes? external views of architecture or interiour views?
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:28 pm
by Frances
There is something seriously wrong with your fryrender setup to have render times like that. I believe it has been pointed out to you that there are other similar renders that cleared in less than 3 hours with lower machine specs. I would ask some questions if I were you.
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:35 pm
by -Adrian
Frances wrote:I would ask some questions if I were you.
let's not get
unpatriotic here Frances, mmkay?
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:39 pm
by Frances
-Adrian wrote:Frances wrote:I would ask some questions if I were you.
let's not get
unpatriotic here Frances, mmkay?
What do you mean?
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:42 pm
by nicole
Hi,
Let's please keep this on topic and not turn this into a MW vs Fry war. Image comparisons are fine as long as they remain friendly, respecting both sides.
Thanks,
Nicole
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 3:43 pm
by Frances
nicole wrote:Hi,
Let's please keep this on topic and not turn this into a MW vs Fry war. Image comparisons are fine as long as they remain friendly, respecting both sides.
Thanks,
Nicole
Thank you.
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 4:10 pm
by glebe digital
Yep, those rendertimes are so monstrously 'out of whack' there's gotta be some scene problem going on there............all the same, nice to see some direct visual comparisons.
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 4:20 pm
by -Adrian
Frances wrote:What do you mean?
It was a joke related the handling of unwanted cristicism in today's media. As i'm explaining it now, it obviously failed ¬¬
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 4:24 pm
by Mr Whippy
The last Fryrender image with the stainless backstrap appears to have some glare, wheras the last Maxwell render doesn't look like it has a glare applied.
The Fryrender's for all their noise do actually look more like photo's of the material in question to me at least.
I'm finding it hard to think this is at all comparitive of the two renderers capabilities and speeds.
Any chance of scene setup screenies and material specifications?
Dave
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 4:30 pm
by Tea_Bag
The brushed effect seems more
visible in most of the fry renders
another thing I have noticed bout trying to create a brushed metal in maxwell is that on spherical shapes it is visible straight away but on "flat" surfaces it seems to struggle to create the brushed effect
edit Dont get me wrong I've seen some great renders using brushed steel but personally I find it a mission on flat surfaces.
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 4:36 pm
by Frances
-Adrian wrote:Frances wrote:What do you mean?
It was a joke related the handling of unwanted cristicism in today's media. As i'm explaining it now, it obviously failed ¬¬
Oops.
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 5:08 pm
by misterasset
The render times do seem excessively long. Could this also be partly to do with FryRender being a Beta and M~R is now at 1.1 (hopefully 1.5 soon
)? If I remember correctly M~R had a speed increase since the beta days... but nothing that would account for 63 hours of difference.