Maxwell Render | Official public forum

Hey, did you guys know Maxwell was noisy? Also, it seems REALLY slow.

I did a comparison render with Bob's Raytracing Engine (bRAY):

bRay - 1 minutes, 23 seconds


Maxwell - 11 seconds


Look how bad the Maxwell one is! When I downloaded the torrent file for Maxwell I was so excited, but now I see that NL has LIED to us about what it can do. This is nowhere near as good as other engines which I also got off of torrentspy. Also, Maxwell is NOT unbiased, as I can clearly prove in the scientific paper I wrote for school entitled: Physically Unbiased Solutions in Rendering Which Maxwell Doesn't Do.


This is PROOF that Maxwell isn't doing anything special, and it can't be used in any production, and it isn't as good as bRAY, and NL is a scamming operation where they steal your money and never contact you, and bRay is better, and even though I hate NL I'm going to come to this forum EVERY SINGLE DAY and post about how much it sucks lol because I have no life.

I wonder how many people are gonna get the sarcasm considering you didn't put any smileys in there
It's a fun read

nice spaceship.

Hi Mike,

There's a hidden commandline switch you never know.
Please use -nonoise to get rid of the noise.
Here's the result at just SL12 with -nonoise switch.
But Mike, it seems like there's something wrong with your scene.
What the hell Robert is doing here instead of that spaceship

©This Robert output rendered by Mihai

Best regards,
Tom

tom, you've been digging in the archives lol

I don't know, the Maxwell version shows a certain avant-garde quality that's missing in the bRAY version. Also, I've met Bob, he's a dick.

Is that an old image from The Thunderbirds? I think I see an eye-screw for a wire on one of the wing tips.

everything hurts good one...

Mihai Iliuta wrote: tom, you've been digging in the archives lol

speaking of archives, this was the best ever:

ROTFLMAOSTC again

when mihai first posted it i laughed my ass off rolling on the floor for a couple of days (good old "where the heck is my cinema plugin" days).

im not going to judge any of the renderers but i think mverta did a mistake in rewriting those equations from the papers

in laminar flow and turbulent flow there should be 4096 and NOT 4000

so mverta has a badly compiled rendering engine

tried myself with those values stated above and with -nonoise option tom mentioned above 11 secs is more than enuff to get a clean photoshot of anything u can model

btw: really good one - at first sight i started to dig the net for explanation, then i returned to read rest of the topic, how silly i am

DELETED

LOL! this is just a too funny thread to read thanks for the great laugh you guys gave me tonight.

/ Max