- Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:34 pm
#285435
I am curious if anyone has an opinion on the quality of the images produced by Maxwell in different versions? Let me just first preface this discussion with the fact that I am extremely impressed with Maxwell and the quality it produces. I also know the result is supposed to be unbiased so there should not be any difference(?)
But still I cannot rid myself from a feeling that the images produced with the first versions of the program had a warmth to them that I find lacking recently.
Maybe it was just that I got very lucky on the first couple of images I did but I find that I am tweaking more these days to get the same result as I got initially in the older versions.
Am I hallucinating or is there some quality that has been lost?
Peder
But still I cannot rid myself from a feeling that the images produced with the first versions of the program had a warmth to them that I find lacking recently.
Maybe it was just that I got very lucky on the first couple of images I did but I find that I am tweaking more these days to get the same result as I got initially in the older versions.
Am I hallucinating or is there some quality that has been lost?
Peder


- By Mark Bell
- By Edward Leibnitz