dyarza wrote:JTB,
Revit is not intended to compete with Max as a modeler, this does not mean that it is any less relevant for Architectural Viz.
I agree but there is a big distanse between MAX and almost no modeling capabilities. I believe that when we are talking about such expensive software, companies should include a full set of needed tools... what Autodesk is doing now, making someone pay 10000€ just to start the work and learn the software for 4-5 months ..... (software pir***)
You would not put cars or people or plants in your model because it is a BIM model for the purpose of creating documents to build a building.
I don't agree... BIM capabilities are irrelevant to the presentation of a building, they are two totally different things and they are both basic needs of a user. So, why do we need accurender for? Shaded model would do OK...
The bigger problem is that the API for Revit is very unfriendly and Autodesk is not very cooperative at all. So if NL is to do a Revit plugin it would be taking lots of resources away to do a product that does not bring so much obvious beneffit.
So, why not an AutoCAD plugin? I can think of hundrends of small companies that create all their products to work inside AutoCAD... Why not Maxwell too?
Out of Revit you can already export into Studio in some ways, so it is probably why a Revit plugin is some time off.
Ok, so a Revit user must be either very rich or very stupid to buy Revit... If I want to do my work with some quality I need Revit for building modeling, AutoCAD for drafting, VIZ/MAX for rendering, etc. Adding the learning hours for all these, you can understand what I mean...
In the meantime, we get more SketchUp plugin updates because SketchUp is very easy to interface with and Google is good about letting developers into the code.
Maybe but Sketchup is not what most people need
Anyway, as I said before, I like Revit very much and the wishlist you read from the Augi forums is writen from hundreds of users, it is not mine... so not all of us are wrong!
