Maxwell Render | Official public forum

An interactive re-creation of the first mission to the moon
http://wechoosethemoon.org/

I always wonder why there are B/W and color photos mixed. Anybody?

I heard they had BW video cam and 35mm cine cams...

By looking at the material on this website, we can clearly see they have all kind of cameras including, b/w photo cam, b/w video cam, color cam and also a color video camera. Although, it's a pity they've not recorded the first contact with moon in color video or in series of high quality photographs or at least they don't share them with us.

They strategically made their camera choices to better deceive the public. They had to deliberately cut some footage/photos that showed unmistakable evidence of studio props.

Bubbaloo wrote:They strategically made their camera choices to better deceive the public. They had to deliberately cut some footage/photos that showed unmistakable evidence of studio props.

... I guess a Maxwell license on that time would have been a precious tool

iker wrote:... I guess a Maxwell license on that time would have been a precious tool

What if they have something better than Maxwell

tom wrote:

iker wrote:... I guess a Maxwell license on that time would have been a precious tool

What if they have something better than Maxwell

Or they did have it and Maxwell is really 40 years old, ....now who's the fool ???

Maybe those barn sized computers really could do more than just calculate pi to 100 digits. lol...

If you consider the massive amounts of noise in the moonwalk videos then yep they must have used Maxwell back then


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMINSD7MmT4

/ Max

Sounds like a good conspiracy theory to me, ......I'm all in.

So NL (and Fry people) just robbed the code? Or the "barn sized computer" itself?

Some nice moon shots here:

http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html

Check out the full Hassleblad magazines.

No Fernando, .....NL IS NASA in disguise ! Why ? .... don't ask, or someone will have to kill ya.


Nice find Glebe ....

I don't know about you guys, but I think I can build one of these myself ! lol... I'll scale the first one down to a coffee can, hack some good old fashioned chinese fireworks add tin foil re-entry shield, insert mouse ------ should be good to go.

I started off naturally believing we went, ....then I didn't, but I'm back to believing we did, yet I have questions ...

1. Why is that we don't see any stars ? (I've done no research here, ...I'll only accept Maxwellian expertise. lol.. The open internet can no longer be trusted. lol...

2. Has anyone successfully given reason how they passed through the Van Allen radiation belt ?

3. Micro-astroidal hits, ... basically the equivalent of space bullets and there are sh_t loads of 'em. Did NASA really just take a chance without any consideration ? I mean, even a single piece of astroidal matter the size of a sand grain moving at 20,000kmH is gonna be lights out.

Satisfaction on those three and I can put this one to bed. lol....



FWIW: Even if its fake, .....I'm glad we have the trick production shots --- lovely and well done. Nice job NASA !!!!!!!!

I'm with you on this. I have gone back and forth on the fakery topic. I heard Buzz Aldrin punched out a guy once for asking him if the landing was faked.

Look at your picture Ivox. Check out the shadows. The shadow of the astronut and the large rock just beneath him do not seem to be parallel, do they... It's so hard to fake the sun...