Page 1 of 1

Burning Saltwater

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:18 pm
by ivox3
I don't think we've talked about this before, similar, but not specifically this .......

John Kanzius ......... amazing guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8sgXUPp9XU&eurl=


Curing Cancer w/nanoparticles ....
http://www.wpbf.com/health/11125485/detail.html

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:44 pm
by ivox3
Before you mention that electrolysis is nothing new, ... I'm just curious if using intense RF vs. standard electrolysis for separating H2O is different ..... ??

.....and I know the amount of energy to create megaWatt transmitters is high, ...but Nikola Tesla I thought could produce intense RF with very small energy footprint(Tesla Coil). Just speculating ......

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:04 pm
by Bubbaloo
Awesome! Now the oil companies will buy the rights and bury it...

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 4:38 pm
by ivox3
Pessimism disguised as realism. .....great quality.

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:42 pm
by glebe digital
Great link, we need more guys like this... :)

Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:11 pm
by rendek
I agree, we would need more of this. I heard from a known physics professor, that it needs more energy that what you can get out...:(

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:58 pm
by Frances
From http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/energyfacts ... rogen.html

"There are currently about 200 hydrogen-fueled vehicles in the United States – mostly in California. Most of these vehicles are buses and automobiles powered by electric motors. They store hydrogen gas or liquid on board and convert the hydrogen into electricity for the motor using a fuel cell. Only a few of these vehicles burn the hydrogen directly (producing almost no pollution).

Hydrogen vehicles are starting to move from the laboratory to the road. One California family has recently leased a hydrogen car for personal use. The U.S. postal service, a package delivery company, a few Florida Park rangers, and a few private utility companies are also using hydrogen vehicles. It will probably be at least 10 years, though, before you can walk into your local car dealer and drive away in an affordable hydrogen-powered car.

Even then, you will need a place to refuel your hydrogen car. Currently, there are about 25 hydrogen refueling stations nationwide. This is the so-called “chicken and egg” problem that hydrogen developers are working hard to solve. Namely: who will buy hydrogen cars if there are no refueling stations? And who will pay to build a refueling station if there are no cars and customers?

One possible solution is to eliminate refueling stations entirely. Automobile manufacturers have already designed a refrigerator-sized hydrogen generator for your garage that works off electricity. Consumers would simply refill their cars with hydrogen each night while it is parked."

I don't know if the generators mentioned are steam-reformed or electrolysis (both described at the link I posted). Steam-reforming emits a lot of greenhouse gases. Electrolysis emits none. Cars that are fitted to use natural gas can already use hydrogen. I wonder if hydrogen would be feasible for air traffic?

Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:14 pm
by ivox3
rendek wrote:I agree, we would need more of this. I heard from a known physics professor, that it needs more energy that what you can get out...:(
That's what my question is about , .... between the work of Tesla and Kanzius, ...maybe not.

ps. Keep an eye out for what people tell you what is possible and what's not ------- nearly every physicist/scientist thought Edison was an idiot as he approached 5000 failed attempts with the lightbulb, ..yet here we are using Maxwell with incandescent presets in the material library on pc's with computing power inconceivable at the time all roughly around the same century of time. :P


If we can believe it, ..we can conceive it.

Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 5:36 pm
by Maxer
This guy built the device to cure cancer which is still in question the burning water thing is just a side benefit.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 5:41 pm
by w i l l
Thats brilliant.